Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCYCX vs RNWBX
MCYCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCYCX vs RNWBX
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl C
Price$11.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.79M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.82
Change+$1.12 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
MCYCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCYCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCYCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. MCYCX (111M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than MCYCX: RNWBX (0.13) vs MCYCX (0.00). MCYCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCYCX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). MCYCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). MCYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCYCX: RNWBX (250) vs MCYCX (2500). MCYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.95 vs. RNWBX (12.55). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.52 vs. MCYCX (15.08).
| MCYCX | RNWBX | MCYCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 1.67 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.67 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.829 | 18.042 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.95 | 12.55 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 34.74 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.08 | 22.52 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers