Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCYSX vs RNWBX
MCYSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCYSX vs RNWBX
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl R6
Price$11.26
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.13M
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.27
Change-$0.46 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.26B
MCYSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCYSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCYSX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.3B vs. MCYSX (106M). MCYSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCYSX (0.68) vs RNWBX (0.13). MCYSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCYSX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MCYSX (1.25). MCYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). MCYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: MCYSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). MCYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.23 vs. RNWBX (5.73). MCYSX return over 5 years is better than : 26.47 vs. RNWBX (24.80).
| MCYSX | RNWBX | MCYSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.427 | 10.496 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 67.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.13 | 505% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 5.73 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.70 | 30.46 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.47 | 24.80 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.20 | - |