Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCYSX vs RNWBX
MCYSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCYSX vs RNWBX
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl R6
Price$11.63
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.47M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.55
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
MCYSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCYSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCYSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. MCYSX (109M). MCYSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCYSX (0.63) vs RNWBX (0.13). MCYSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCYSX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MCYSX (1.25). MCYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). MCYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: MCYSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). MCYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.06 vs. RNWBX (7.47). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.87 vs. MCYSX (20.12).
| MCYSX | RNWBX | MCYSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.022 | 14.956 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.13 | 491% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 7.47 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.34 | 37.59 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.12 | 22.87 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement