MDBPF
Price
$2.77
Change
+$0.78 (+39.20%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
5.23B
PIAIF
Price
$5.97
Change
-$0.14 (-2.29%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
133.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MDBPF vs PIAIF

Header iconMDBPF vs PIAIF Comparison
Open Charts MDBPF vs PIAIFBanner chart's image
MEDIBANK PRIVATE
Price$2.77
Change+$0.78 (+39.20%)
Volume$33.92K
Capitalization5.23B
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China
Price$5.97
Change-$0.14 (-2.29%)
Volume$366.28K
Capitalization133.31B
MDBPF vs PIAIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PIAIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MDBPF vs. PIAIF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDBPF is a Hold and PIAIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MDBPF: $2.77 vs. PIAIF: $5.97)
Brand notoriety: MDBPF and PIAIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDBPF: 100% vs. PIAIF: 424%
Market capitalization -- MDBPF: $5.23B vs. PIAIF: $133.31B
MDBPF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $5.23B. PIAIF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $133.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDBPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIAIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MDBPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIAIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDBPF is a better buy in the long-term than PIAIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PIAIF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PIAIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MDBPF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PIAIF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

PIAIF is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.79% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIAIF($133B) has a higher market cap than MDBPF($5.23B). MDBPF has higher P/E ratio than PIAIF: MDBPF (15.89) vs PIAIF (9.17). MDBPF YTD gains are higher at: 39.196 vs. PIAIF (9.541). PIAIF has more cash in the bank: 794B vs. MDBPF (504M). MDBPF has less debt than PIAIF: MDBPF (70.1M) vs PIAIF (1.35T). PIAIF has higher revenues than MDBPF: PIAIF (1.04T) vs MDBPF (5.22B).
MDBPFPIAIFMDBPF / PIAIF
Capitalization5.23B133B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD39.1969.541411%
P/E Ratio15.899.17173%
Revenue5.22B1.04T1%
Total Cash504M794B0%
Total Debt70.1M1.35T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDBPF vs PIAIF: Fundamental Ratings
MDBPF
PIAIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
461
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1265
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIAIF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDBPF (46). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDBPF’s over the last 12 months.

MDBPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIAIF (100). This means that MDBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIAIF’s over the last 12 months.

PIAIF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDBPF (46). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDBPF’s over the last 12 months.

MDBPF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PIAIF (50). This means that MDBPF’s stock grew similarly to PIAIF’s over the last 12 months.

MDBPF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIAIF (65). This means that MDBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIAIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDBPFPIAIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PIAIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWMGX64.110.17
+0.27%
American Funds Washington Mutual R6
ACGMX22.68N/A
N/A
Invesco Growth and Income Y
QCELX20.40N/A
N/A
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style I
EKGIX40.50N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Global Small Cap Inst
LICTX17.48N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Equity R5

MDBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MDBPF and MFC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDBPF and MFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDBPF
1D Price
Change %
MDBPF100%
N/A
MFC - MDBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
PUKPF - MDBPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLIF - MDBPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
ELFIF - MDBPF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
PIAIF - MDBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PIAIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIAIF has been loosely correlated with PNGAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIAIF jumps, then PNGAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIAIF
1D Price
Change %
PIAIF100%
N/A
PNGAY - PIAIF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
AAIGF - PIAIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.98%
AAGIY - PIAIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
CILJF - PIAIF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
PUKPF - PIAIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More