Ad is loading...
MDCPX vs RLBFX
MDCPX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts MDCPX vs RLBFX
BlackRock Balanced Investor A
Price$25.61
Change+$0.31 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.76
Change+$0.43 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9B
MDCPX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDCPX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDCPX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 227B vs. MDCPX (1.55B). MDCPX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: MDCPX (3.81) vs RLBFX (2.26). MDCPX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: MDCPX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). MDCPX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MDCPX (127.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDCPX: RLBFX (250) vs MDCPX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.48 vs. MDCPX (3.67). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.46 vs. MDCPX (25.77).
| MDCPX | RLBFX | MDCPX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.30 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.30 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.786 | -1.457 | 123% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 227B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 2.26 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.67 | 4.48 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.83 | 15.28 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.77 | 37.46 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.78 | 49.65 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...