MDEVF
Price
$0.59
Change
+$0.02 (+3.51%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.63B
RANKF
Price
$1.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
856.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MDEVF vs RANKF

Header iconMDEVF vs RANKF Comparison
Open Charts MDEVF vs RANKFBanner chart's image
Melco International Development
Price$0.59
Change+$0.02 (+3.51%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization1.63B
Rank Group (THE) p.l.c
Price$1.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$270
Capitalization856.08M
MDEVF vs RANKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MDEVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RANKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MDEVF vs. RANKF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDEVF is a Hold and RANKF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MDEVF: $0.59 vs. RANKF: $1.70)
Brand notoriety: MDEVF and RANKF are both not notable
MDEVF represents the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines, while RANKF is part of the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDEVF: 184% vs. RANKF: 6%
Market capitalization -- MDEVF: $1.63B vs. RANKF: $856.08M
MDEVF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $1.63B. RANKF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $856.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $39.62B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $54.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.87B. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDEVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRANKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MDEVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RANKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RANKF is a better buy in the long-term than MDEVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDEVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RANKF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MDEVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RANKF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RANKF is a better buy in the short-term than MDEVF.

Price Growth

MDEVF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +3.69% price change this week, while RANKF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +3.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.76%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+3.84% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

@Casinos/Gaming (+0.17% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDEVF($1.63B) has a higher market cap than RANKF($856M). RANKF YTD gains are higher at: 111.180 vs. MDEVF (1.638).
MDEVFRANKFMDEVF / RANKF
Capitalization1.63B856M191%
EBITDAN/A105M-
Gain YTD1.638111.1801%
P/E RatioN/A13.28-
RevenueN/A774M-
Total CashN/A72.6M-
Total DebtN/A183M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDEVF vs RANKF: Fundamental Ratings
MDEVF
RANKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8247
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9878
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6595
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RANKF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDEVF (88). This means that RANKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDEVF’s over the last 12 months.

RANKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MDEVF (100). This means that RANKF’s stock grew similarly to MDEVF’s over the last 12 months.

RANKF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MDEVF (98). This means that RANKF’s stock grew similarly to MDEVF’s over the last 12 months.

RANKF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MDEVF (59). This means that RANKF’s stock grew similarly to MDEVF’s over the last 12 months.

MDEVF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as RANKF (95). This means that MDEVF’s stock grew similarly to RANKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDEVFRANKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MDEVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RANKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IOLZX29.31N/A
N/A
ICON Equity Institutional
MMCRX17.31N/A
N/A
Madison Mid Cap R6
KCVIX18.42N/A
N/A
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value I
MRNPX32.83N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp IR
HLIZX28.89N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner International Eq Instl Z

MDEVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MDEVF and SCHYY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDEVF and SCHYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDEVF
1D Price
Change %
MDEVF100%
N/A
SCHYY - MDEVF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
GXYYY - MDEVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
WYNMY - MDEVF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.71%
WYNN - MDEVF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.46%
NGCRF - MDEVF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RANKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RANKF and SKXJF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RANKF and SKXJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RANKF
1D Price
Change %
RANKF100%
N/A
SKXJF - RANKF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNMF - RANKF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCHYY - RANKF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
NGCRF - RANKF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDEVF - RANKF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More