Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.60
Change-$0.03 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.52
Change-$0.52 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. MDFSX (196M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (2.73) vs RMEBX (1.54). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.12 vs. MDFSX (19.45). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. MDFSX (20.35).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.344 | 16.258 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 196M | 104B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.54 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.45 | 21.12 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.61 | 14.92 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.35 | 43.89 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.40 | 63.64 | -24% |