Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.42
Change-$0.03 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.9M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.32
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. MDFSX (142M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (2.19) vs RMEBX (1.21). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.09 vs. MDFSX (-5.08). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.06 vs. MDFSX (28.40).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.876 | 2.865 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.21 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.08 | 5.09 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.98 | 17.98 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.40 | 58.06 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.73 | 60.34 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement