Ad is loading...
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.87
Change+$0.05 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets181.79M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.08
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. MDFSX (182M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (2.73) vs RMEBX (1.54). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. MDFSX (8.42). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. MDFSX (11.29).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.238 | 2.149 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 182M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.54 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 12.29 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.77 | 12.11 | -39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.29 | 36.84 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.07 | 63.72 | -25% |