Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.25
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.64M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.45
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. MDFSX (150M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (1.88) vs RMEBX (1.05). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. MDFSX (0.27). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.09 vs. MDFSX (27.75).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.015 | 14.628 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.05 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | 7.96 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.60 | 43.02 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.75 | 58.09 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.41 | 92.06 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers