Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.33M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. MDFSX (144M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (2.14) vs RMEBX (1.16). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. MDFSX (0.44). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. MDFSX (27.71).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.652 | 5.923 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 1.16 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.44 | 8.54 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.67 | 27.89 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.71 | 58.69 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.30 | 68.22 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement