Ad is loading...
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.24
Change+$0.46 (+6.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.83M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. MDFSX (149M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (2.07) vs RMEBX (1.18). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.84). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.56 vs. MDFSX (-14.89). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. MDFSX (18.32).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.790 | -7.747 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 92.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.18 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.89 | -4.56 | 327% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.12 | -1.07 | 1,594% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.32 | 44.36 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.75 | 44.99 | -64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...