Ad is loading...
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.87
Change-$0.10 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.24M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. MDFSX (174M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (2.73) vs RMEBX (1.54). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. MDFSX (3.80). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. MDFSX (13.16).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.238 | 4.809 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.54 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 10.88 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.33 | 19.18 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.16 | 40.75 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.46 | 63.29 | -29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...