Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.35M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.41
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.38B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. MDFSX (148M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (2.07) vs RMEBX (1.12). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. MDFSX (2.97). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 61.24 vs. MDFSX (32.40).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.886 | 8.799 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.12 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.97 | 10.24 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.45 | 28.20 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.40 | 61.24 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.68 | 75.62 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement