Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
MDFSX vs RMFCX
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.60
Change-$0.03 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.23
Change-$0.50 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. MDFSX (196M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDFSX (2.73) vs RMFCX (1.69). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMFCX (22 years). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFCX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.31 vs. MDFSX (19.45). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.92 vs. MDFSX (20.35).
| MDFSX | RMFCX | MDFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.344 | 16.440 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 196M | 104B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.69 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.45 | 21.31 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.61 | 15.46 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.35 | 44.92 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.40 | 65.01 | -24% |