Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMFCX
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.33M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. MDFSX (144M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDFSX (2.14) vs RMFCX (1.31). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFCX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. MDFSX (0.44). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. MDFSX (27.71).
| MDFSX | RMFCX | MDFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.652 | 6.021 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 1.31 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.44 | 8.70 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.67 | 28.43 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.71 | 59.85 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.30 | 69.75 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement