Ad is loading...
MDFSX vs RMFCX
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.46
Change-$0.19 (-2.48%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.22
Change-$1.42 (-2.55%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.7B vs. MDFSX (185M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDFSX (2.73) vs RMFCX (1.69). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFCX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. MDFSX (5.51). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.39 vs. MDFSX (9.72).
| MDFSX | RMFCX | MDFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.805 | 11.423 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185M | 98.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.69 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 12.63 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.01 | 14.16 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.72 | 40.39 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.30 | 61.84 | -30% |