Ad is loading...
MDFSX vs RMFCX
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.24
Change+$0.46 (+6.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.83M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. MDFSX (149M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDFSX (2.07) vs RMFCX (1.34). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.84). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFCX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. MDFSX (-14.89). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. MDFSX (18.32).
| MDFSX | RMFCX | MDFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.790 | -7.697 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 92.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.34 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.89 | -4.43 | 336% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.12 | -0.65 | 2,634% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.32 | 45.42 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.75 | 46.29 | -62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...