Ad is loading...
MDFSX vs RMFCX
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.97
Change+$0.05 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.98M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.05
Change+$0.39 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.76B
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. MDFSX (177M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDFSX (2.73) vs RMFCX (1.69). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFCX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. MDFSX (6.94). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.08 vs. MDFSX (17.06).
| MDFSX | RMFCX | MDFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.901 | 4.506 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.69 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 13.79 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.73 | 16.01 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.06 | 45.08 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.47 | 70.14 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...