Ad is loading...
MDFSX vs RMFEX
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFEX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.24
Change+$0.46 (+6.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.83M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.89
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. MDFSX (149M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: MDFSX (2.07) vs RMFEX (1.61). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). MDFSX (0.84) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFEX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.11 vs. MDFSX (-14.89). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.69 vs. MDFSX (18.32).
| MDFSX | RMFEX | MDFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.62 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.62 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.790 | -7.620 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 92.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.61 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.89 | -4.11 | 362% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.12 | 0.28 | -6,191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.32 | 47.69 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.75 | 51.93 | -55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...