Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMFEX
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFEX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.42
Change-$0.03 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.9M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.37
Change-$0.15 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. MDFSX (142M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: MDFSX (2.19) vs RMFEX (1.65). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). MDFSX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFEX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.55 vs. MDFSX (-5.08). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.67 vs. MDFSX (28.40).
| MDFSX | RMFEX | MDFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.876 | 3.037 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.65 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.08 | 5.55 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.98 | 19.57 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.40 | 61.67 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.73 | 67.98 | -33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement