Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RWEBX
MDFSX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RWEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.25
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.64M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.3B
MDFSX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. MDFSX (150M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: MDFSX (1.88) vs RWEBX (0.76). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: MDFSX (14 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RWEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.21 vs. MDFSX (0.27). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 48.18 vs. MDFSX (27.75).
| MDFSX | RWEBX | MDFSX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.06 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.06 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.015 | 10.050 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 0.76 | 248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | 6.21 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.60 | 42.84 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.75 | 48.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.41 | 76.27 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers