Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RWEBX
MDFSX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RWEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.26
Change+$0.13 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.26M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.71
Change+$0.63 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.09B
MDFSX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. MDFSX (145M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: MDFSX (1.89) vs RWEBX (0.76). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: MDFSX (14 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RWEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.72 vs. MDFSX (-3.29). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.69 vs. MDFSX (22.15).
| MDFSX | RWEBX | MDFSX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.06 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.06 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.015 | 8.076 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 0.76 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.29 | 2.72 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.89 | 25.48 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.15 | 40.69 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.37 | 66.54 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement