Advertisement
MDLZ vs STKL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDLZ is a Buy and STKL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MDLZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTKL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MDLZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STKL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDLZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STKL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- STKL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.21% price change this week, while STKL (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.75%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +4.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
STKL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.20% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+4.29% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| MDLZ | STKL | MDLZ / STKL | |
| Capitalization | 79.7B | 756M | 10,542% |
| EBITDA | 6B | 63.8M | 9,408% |
| Gain YTD | 6.444 | -16.623 | -39% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.97 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 37.1B | 763M | 4,862% |
| Total Cash | 1.5B | 2.16M | 69,597% |
| Total Debt | 21.5B | 397M | 5,416% |
MDLZ | STKL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDLZ's Valuation (37) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STKL (86) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than STKL’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STKL (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than STKL’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's SMR Rating (58) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STKL (93) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than STKL’s over the last 12 months.
STKL's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that STKL’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
STKL's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (65) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that STKL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
| MDLZ | STKL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 54% | 12 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
MDLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | +1.79% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| HSY - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.25% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||
STKL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that STKL and USNA have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STKL and USNA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STKL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STKL | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| USNA - STKL | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
| THS - STKL | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| CENTA - STKL | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| CENT - STKL | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| BRFS - STKL | 28% Poorly correlated | +5.58% | ||
More | ||||