MDNAF
Price
$0.71
Change
-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
59.23M
39 days until earnings call
VIR
Price
$5.73
Change
+$0.07 (+1.24%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
795.99M
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MDNAF vs VIR

Header iconMDNAF vs VIR Comparison
Open Charts MDNAF vs VIRBanner chart's image
Medicenna Therapeutics
Price$0.71
Change-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Volume$111.92K
Capitalization59.23M
Vir Biotechnology
Price$5.73
Change+$0.07 (+1.24%)
Volume$1.75M
Capitalization795.99M
MDNAF vs VIR Comparison Chart in %
MDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MDNAF vs. VIR commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDNAF is a Buy and VIR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MDNAF: $0.71 vs. VIR: $5.73)
Brand notoriety: MDNAF and VIR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDNAF: 229% vs. VIR: 132%
Market capitalization -- MDNAF: $59.23M vs. VIR: $795.99M
MDNAF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $59.23M. VIR’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $795.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $103.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDNAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVIR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MDNAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VIR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VIR is a better buy in the long-term than MDNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDNAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MDNAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VIR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VIR is a better buy in the short-term than MDNAF.

Price Growth

MDNAF (@Biotechnology) experienced а +1.75% price change this week, while VIR (@Biotechnology) price change was +4.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +4.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +80.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

MDNAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

VIR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+4.93% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIR($796M) has a higher market cap than MDNAF($59.2M). VIR YTD gains are higher at: -21.935 vs. MDNAF (-37.974). MDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -21.81M vs. VIR (-586.27M). VIR has more cash in the bank: 606M vs. MDNAF (20.5M). MDNAF has less debt than VIR: MDNAF (162K) vs VIR (102M). VIR has higher revenues than MDNAF: VIR (14.4M) vs MDNAF (0).
MDNAFVIRMDNAF / VIR
Capitalization59.2M796M7%
EBITDA-21.81M-586.27M4%
Gain YTD-37.974-21.935173%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue014.4M-
Total Cash20.5M606M3%
Total Debt162K102M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDNAF vs VIR: Fundamental Ratings
MDNAF
VIR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5027
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10027
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDNAF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as VIR (49). This means that MDNAF’s stock grew similarly to VIR’s over the last 12 months.

MDNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VIR (100). This means that MDNAF’s stock grew similarly to VIR’s over the last 12 months.

VIR's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as MDNAF (98). This means that VIR’s stock grew similarly to MDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

VIR's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as MDNAF (63). This means that VIR’s stock grew similarly to MDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

VIR's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MDNAF (100). This means that VIR’s stock grew significantly faster than MDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDNAFVIR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VIR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESAGX13.580.09
+0.67%
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG A
SSILX14.980.06
+0.40%
State Street International Stock Sel A
FOSCX29.830.11
+0.37%
Tributary Small Company Instl
SPFAX30.85-0.08
-0.26%
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth A
HGOVX85.37-0.34
-0.40%
Hartford Growth Opportunities R6

MDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MDNAF and LRMR have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDNAF and LRMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDNAF
1D Price
Change %
MDNAF100%
-1.36%
LRMR - MDNAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+13.79%
VIR - MDNAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
STOK - MDNAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
CGEM - MDNAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
PTCT - MDNAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
More

VIR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIR has been loosely correlated with SANA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIR jumps, then SANA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIR
1D Price
Change %
VIR100%
+1.24%
SANA - VIR
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
CPRX - VIR
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AXON - VIR
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
NRIX - VIR
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.30%
RLAY - VIR
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.98%
More