MDNGF
Price
$0.92
Change
-$0.04 (-4.17%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
186.38M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NEXA
Price
$6.59
Change
+$0.44 (+7.15%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
867.47M
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MDNGF vs NEXA

Header iconMDNGF vs NEXA Comparison
Open Charts MDNGF vs NEXABanner chart's image
Midnight Sun Mining
Price$0.92
Change-$0.04 (-4.17%)
Volume$167.52K
Capitalization186.38M
Nexa Resources SA
Price$6.59
Change+$0.44 (+7.15%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization867.47M
MDNGF vs NEXA Comparison Chart in %
MDNGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEXA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MDNGF vs. NEXA commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDNGF is a Hold and NEXA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (MDNGF: $0.92 vs. NEXA: $6.15)
Brand notoriety: MDNGF and NEXA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDNGF: 82% vs. NEXA: 98%
Market capitalization -- MDNGF: $187.2M vs. NEXA: $867.47M
MDNGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $187.2M. NEXA’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $867.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDNGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEXA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MDNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEXA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEXA is a better buy in the long-term than MDNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDNGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEXA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MDNGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NEXA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEXA is a better buy in the short-term than MDNGF.

Price Growth

MDNGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -15.67% price change this week, while NEXA (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +99.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEXA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-0.99% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEXA($867M) has a higher market cap than MDNGF($186M). MDNGF YTD gains are higher at: 150.068 vs. NEXA (-28.650). NEXA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 775M vs. MDNGF (-5.35M). NEXA has more cash in the bank: 470M vs. MDNGF (9.4M). MDNGF has less debt than NEXA: MDNGF (276K) vs NEXA (1.96B). NEXA has higher revenues than MDNGF: NEXA (2.84B) vs MDNGF (0).
MDNGFNEXAMDNGF / NEXA
Capitalization186M867M21%
EBITDA-5.35M775M-1%
Gain YTD150.068-28.650-524%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue02.84B-
Total Cash9.4M470M2%
Total Debt276K1.96B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDNGF vs NEXA: Fundamental Ratings
MDNGF
NEXA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6383
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3687
SMR RATING
1..100
9488
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEXA's Valuation (4) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDNGF (66) in the null industry. This means that NEXA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MDNGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEXA (87) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MDNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEXA’s over the last 12 months.

NEXA's SMR Rating (88) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as MDNGF (94) in the null industry. This means that NEXA’s stock grew similarly to MDNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MDNGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as NEXA (48) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MDNGF’s stock grew similarly to NEXA’s over the last 12 months.

NEXA's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for MDNGF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEXA’s stock grew significantly faster than MDNGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDNGFNEXA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MDNGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEXA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENPSX35.10N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraSector Energy Svc
FUNCX31.04N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth C
VKSRX19.12N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Core R6
VEUCX34.86-0.31
-0.88%
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic C
NWHQX34.59-0.60
-1.71%
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci M

MDNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MDNGF and WMLLF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDNGF and WMLLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDNGF
1D Price
Change %
MDNGF100%
-4.07%
WMLLF - MDNGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
NEXA - MDNGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
VDOMF - MDNGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.94%
MKRIF - MDNGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIDLF - MDNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+35.48%
More