Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDPCX vs RNWHX
MDPCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MDPCX vs RNWHX
BlackRock Sustainable Em Mkts Eq Inv A
Price$14.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.32M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.24
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.3B
MDPCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDPCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDPCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.3B vs. MDPCX (78.3M). MDPCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MDPCX (2.14) vs RNWHX (0.99). MDPCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MDPCX (31 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MDPCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MDPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDPCX: RNWHX (250) vs MDPCX (1000). MDPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.08 vs. RNWHX (11.38). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.23 vs. MDPCX (-1.33).
| MDPCX | RNWHX | MDPCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.72 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.879 | 16.219 | 104% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.3M | 70.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 0.99 | 217% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.08 | 11.38 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.78 | 41.17 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.33 | 29.23 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement