Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDPCX vs RNWHX
MDPCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MDPCX vs RNWHX
BlackRock Sustainable Em Mkts Eq Inv A
Price$14.85
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.74M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.64
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.7B
MDPCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDPCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDPCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. MDPCX (79.7M). MDPCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MDPCX (2.30) vs RNWHX (1.04). MDPCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MDPCX (31 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MDPCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). MDPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDPCX: RNWHX (250) vs MDPCX (1000). MDPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.89 vs. RNWHX (11.44). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 35.41 vs. MDPCX (4.62).
| MDPCX | RNWHX | MDPCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.72 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.850 | 15.285 | 110% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.7M | 69.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 1.04 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.89 | 11.44 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.52 | 37.22 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.62 | 35.41 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement