MDU vs SDY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDU is a Hold and SDY is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MDU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
MDU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MDU | SDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 60% | 20 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSQ | 36.36 | 0.16 | +0.44% |
| ProShares Short QQQ | |||
| UDIV | 46.92 | -0.16 | -0.33% |
| Franklin US Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | |||
| ILCG | 93.18 | -0.42 | -0.44% |
| iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | |||
| FDWM | 23.72 | -0.35 | -1.45% |
| Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF | |||
| FBL | 37.14 | -0.58 | -1.54% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | |||
MDU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDU has been loosely correlated with MATW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDU jumps, then MATW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDU | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| MATW - MDU | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| TRC - MDU | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| NWPX - MDU | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| CODI - MDU | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| MLI - MDU | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
More | ||||