Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RMFCX
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.59
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.97M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.07
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. MDVZX (147M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDVZX (2.16) vs RMFCX (1.26). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDVZX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. MDVZX (1.01). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.95 vs. MDVZX (28.52).
| MDVZX | RMFCX | MDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.894 | 10.721 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 1.26 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.01 | 7.77 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.31 | 22.69 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.52 | 54.95 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers