Ad is loading...
MDVZX vs RMFCX
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.25
Change-$0.12 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.22M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.21
Change-$0.57 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.33B
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. MDVZX (170M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDVZX (2.19) vs RMFCX (1.30). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDVZX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.49). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. MDVZX (0.56). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 77.01 vs. MDVZX (58.08).
| MDVZX | RMFCX | MDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.91 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.826 | 1.136 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.30 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.56 | 5.61 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.90 | 15.62 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.08 | 77.01 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...