Ad is loading...
MDVZX vs RMFCX
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$7.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.72M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.99
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. MDVZX (141M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDVZX (2.34) vs RMFCX (1.37). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDVZX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. MDVZX (-5.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.82 vs. MDVZX (31.17).
| MDVZX | RMFCX | MDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.978 | 1.050 | -188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 1.37 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.30 | 4.39 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.53 | 17.27 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.17 | 55.82 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...