Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RMFCX
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.28
Change+$0.04 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.01M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. MDVZX (144M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDVZX (2.28) vs RMFCX (1.31). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDVZX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. MDVZX (0.27). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.87 vs. MDVZX (34.28).
| MDVZX | RMFCX | MDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.725 | 7.403 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.28 | 1.31 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | 9.64 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.55 | 26.42 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.28 | 63.87 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement