Ad is loading...
MDVZX vs RMFCX
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$7.66
Change+$0.05 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.55M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. MDVZX (155M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDVZX (2.21) vs RMFCX (1.34). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDVZX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.49). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. MDVZX (-6.13). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. MDVZX (26.73).
| MDVZX | RMFCX | MDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.91 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.435 | -3.342 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 96.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 1.34 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.13 | 3.60 | -170% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.44 | 5.79 | -180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.73 | 48.78 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...