Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RMFCX
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.74
Change-$0.06 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.41M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. MDVZX (148M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDVZX (2.08) vs RMFCX (1.24). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDVZX (7 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. MDVZX (2.65). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.72 vs. MDVZX (31.99).
| MDVZX | RMFCX | MDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.756 | 11.292 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 1.24 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | 8.71 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.47 | 28.01 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.99 | 56.72 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement