Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RMFCX
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.86
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.19M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. MDVZX (145M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDVZX (2.00) vs RMFCX (1.21). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDVZX (7 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. MDVZX (-1.23). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. MDVZX (25.45).
| MDVZX | RMFCX | MDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.794 | 12.783 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.21 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.23 | 6.00 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.29 | 27.94 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.45 | 52.67 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement