Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RWEBX
MDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RWEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.91
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.64M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.74B
MDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. MDVZX (150M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: MDVZX (2.00) vs RWEBX (0.76). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: MDVZX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RWEBX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.21 vs. MDVZX (1.09). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 48.18 vs. MDVZX (31.99).
| MDVZX | RWEBX | MDVZX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.06 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.06 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.293 | 10.050 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 0.76 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.09 | 6.21 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.35 | 42.84 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.99 | 48.18 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement