Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RWMHX
MDVZX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RWMHX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.86
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.19M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.12
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
MDVZX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. MDVZX (145M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: MDVZX (2.00) vs RWMHX (1.33). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: MDVZX (7 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). MDVZX (0.45) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RWMHX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.48 vs. MDVZX (-1.23). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.42 vs. MDVZX (25.45).
| MDVZX | RWMHX | MDVZX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.41 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.41 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.794 | 8.808 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.33 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.23 | 4.48 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.29 | 29.53 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.45 | 44.42 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement