Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDXBX vs MFSMX
MDXBX vs MFSMX Comparison
Open Charts MDXBX vs MFSMX
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
MFS MD Municipal Bond A
Price$9.98
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.88M
MDXBX vs MFSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDXBX vs. MFSMX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDXBX is a Hold and MFSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. MFSMX (149M). MDXBX pays higher dividends than MFSMX: MDXBX (3.50) vs MFSMX (3.26). MDXBX was incepted earlier than MFSMX: MDXBX (38 years) vs MFSMX (41 years). MFSMX (1.01) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. MFSMX (9.00). MFSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: MFSMX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. MFSMX (1.23). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.55 vs. MFSMX (4.71).
| MDXBX | MFSMX | MDXBX / MFSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.85 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.01 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.061 | 2.099 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 149M | 1,572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 3.26 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.47 | 1.23 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.98 | 12.22 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.55 | 4.71 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.99 | 17.42 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement