Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDXBX vs MSNCX
MDXBX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts MDXBX vs MSNCX
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.67
Change+$0.04 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.33
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets460.11M
MDXBX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDXBX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDXBX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. MSNCX (460M). MDXBX pays higher dividends than MSNCX: MDXBX (3.46) vs MSNCX (3.27). MDXBX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: MDXBX (38 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). MSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: MSNCX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.67 vs. MSNCX (-2.53). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.33 vs. MSNCX (-1.05).
| MDXBX | MSNCX | MDXBX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.84 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.86 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.809 | -3.251 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 460M | 488% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.46 | 3.27 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -2.53 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.47 | 2.48 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.33 | -1.05 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.30 | 10.42 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement