Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDXBX vs NACCX
MDXBX vs NACCX Comparison
Open Charts MDXBX vs NACCX
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
Nuveen MD Municipal Bond C
Price$9.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.98M
MDXBX vs NACCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDXBX vs. NACCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDXBX is a Hold and NACCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. NACCX (234M). MDXBX pays higher dividends than NACCX: MDXBX (3.51) vs NACCX (2.72). MDXBX was incepted earlier than NACCX: MDXBX (38 years) vs NACCX (12 years). NACCX (1.63) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). NACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). MDXBX (2500) and NACCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.91 vs. NACCX (-2.18). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.16 vs. NACCX (-3.79).
| MDXBX | NACCX | MDXBX / NACCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.56 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.63 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.398 | -2.132 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 234M | 972% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 2.72 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.91 | -2.18 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.91 | 3.13 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.16 | -3.79 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.81 | 3.37 | 380% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers