Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDXBX vs NMMDX
MDXBX vs NMMDX Comparison
Open Charts MDXBX vs NMMDX
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.67
Change+$0.04 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
Nuveen MD Municipal Bond I
Price$9.44
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.12M
MDXBX vs NMMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDXBX vs. NMMDX commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDXBX is a Hold and NMMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. NMMDX (238M). NMMDX pays higher dividends than MDXBX: NMMDX (3.71) vs MDXBX (3.46). MDXBX was incepted earlier than NMMDX: MDXBX (38 years) vs NMMDX (33 years). NMMDX (0.63) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). NMMDX (18.00) and MDXBX (17.30) have comparable annual turnover. MDXBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMMDX: MDXBX (2500) vs NMMDX (100000). NMMDX (-1.64) and MDXBX (-1.67) have marching annual gain over last year. MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.33 vs. NMMDX (0.06).
| MDXBX | NMMDX | MDXBX / NMMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.56 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.63 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.809 | -2.679 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 238M | 944% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.46 | 3.71 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -1.64 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.47 | 4.05 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.33 | 0.06 | 592% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.30 | 10.53 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement