Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDYG vs QMOM
MDYG vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts MDYG vs QMOM
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
Price$89.07
Change-$0.27 (-0.30%)
Volume$200
Net Assets2.41B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$62.63
Change+$0.27 (+0.43%)
Volume$549
Net Assets334.94M
MDYG vs QMOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDYG vs. QMOM commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDYG is a Hold and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.41B vs. QMOM (335M). MDYG has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: MDYG (3.240) vs QMOM (-2.753). MDYG was incepted earlier than QMOM: MDYG (20 years) vs QMOM (10 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover MDYG (51.00) vs MDYG (51.00).
| MDYG | QMOM | MDYG / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 3.240 | -2.753 | -118% |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 335M | 720% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.29 | 52% |
| Turnover | 51.00 | 363.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.84 | 1.41 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MDYG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 29 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 86% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| JHG - MDYG | 86% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 86% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| CG - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| ARES - QMOM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| APO - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||