Ad is loading...
MDYG vs QMOM
MDYG vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts MDYG vs QMOM
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
Price$74.27
Change-$3.04 (-3.93%)
Volume$194.79K
Net Assets2.39B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$54.83
Change-$1.90 (-3.35%)
Volume$49.82K
Net Assets285.28M
MDYG vs QMOM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDYG vs. QMOM commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDYG is a Hold and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.39B vs. QMOM (285M). MDYG (-14.367) and QMOM (-14.502) have matching annual dividend yield . MDYG was incepted earlier than QMOM: MDYG (19 years) vs QMOM (9 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover MDYG (51.00) vs MDYG (51.00).
| MDYG | QMOM | MDYG / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | -14.367 | -14.502 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 285M | 838% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.29 | 52% |
| Turnover | 51.00 | 363.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.97 | 1.52 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MDYG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | -3.93% | ||
| JHG - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | -8.23% | ||
| JEF - MDYG | 81% Closely correlated | -9.89% | ||
| HLNE - MDYG | 80% Closely correlated | -6.13% | ||
| NOVT - MDYG | 80% Closely correlated | -5.80% | ||
| EXP - MDYG | 79% Closely correlated | -3.84% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | -3.35% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| GEV - QMOM | 73% Closely correlated | -5.16% | ||
| EXP - QMOM | 73% Closely correlated | -3.84% | ||
| VST - QMOM | 72% Closely correlated | -7.42% | ||
| ETN - QMOM | 72% Closely correlated | -4.54% | ||
More | ||||