It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MEC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MEC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MEC (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -1.06% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.64%.
MEC is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.
The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
MEC | RCMT | MEC / RCMT | |
Capitalization | 287M | 170M | 169% |
EBITDA | 64.6M | 24.8M | 260% |
Gain YTD | -10.560 | -30.325 | 35% |
P/E Ratio | 11.34 | 10.56 | 107% |
Revenue | 609M | 263M | 232% |
Total Cash | 178K | 6.28M | 3% |
Total Debt | 141M | 34M | 415% |
MEC | RCMT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MEC's Valuation (70) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RCMT (88) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that MEC’s stock grew similarly to RCMT’s over the last 12 months.
RCMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as MEC (60) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RCMT’s stock grew similarly to MEC’s over the last 12 months.
RCMT's SMR Rating (17) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEC (79) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RCMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEC’s over the last 12 months.
MEC's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RCMT (81) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that MEC’s stock grew similarly to RCMT’s over the last 12 months.
RCMT's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as MEC (97) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RCMT’s stock grew similarly to MEC’s over the last 12 months.
MEC | RCMT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago75% | 10 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 4 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RCMT and MATW have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCMT and MATW's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RCMT | 100% | -13.45% | ||
MATW - RCMT | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
HON - RCMT | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
MEC - RCMT | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.06% | ||
NWPX - RCMT | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
VMI - RCMT | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
More |