Ad is loading...
MECAX vs OSMNX
MECAX vs OSMNX Comparison
Open Charts MECAX vs OSMNX
AMG GW&K International Small Cap N
Price$45.94
Change+$0.46 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.75M
Invesco International Small-Mid Com R
Price$36.79
Change+$0.31 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
MECAX vs OSMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MECAX vs. OSMNX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MECAX is a Buy and OSMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSMNX has more cash in the bank: 3.51B vs. MECAX (38.7M). MECAX pays higher dividends than OSMNX: MECAX (1.99) vs OSMNX (1.14). MECAX was incepted earlier than OSMNX: MECAX (29 years) vs OSMNX (24 years). OSMNX (1.63) is less costly to investors than MECAX (1.52). MECAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. OSMNX (21.00). OSMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than MECAX: OSMNX (1000) vs MECAX (2000). MECAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. OSMNX (-5.57). MECAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.54 vs. OSMNX (-9.73).
| MECAX | OSMNX | MECAX / OSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.63 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.63 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.511 | 8.831 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.7M | 3.51B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.14 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.55 | -5.57 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.93 | 1.99 | 851% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.54 | -9.73 | -190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.23 | 8.05 | 438% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...