MED
Price
$14.90
Change
-$0.21 (-1.39%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
417.52M
8 days until earnings call
RGS
Price
$20.32
Change
-$0.87 (-4.11%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
17.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MED vs RGS

Header iconMED vs RGS Comparison
Open Charts MED vs RGSBanner chart's image
Medifast
Price$14.90
Change-$0.21 (-1.39%)
Volume$200.76K
Capitalization417.52M
Regis
Price$20.32
Change-$0.87 (-4.11%)
Volume$21.9K
Capitalization17.1M
MED vs RGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MED vs. RGS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MED is a StrongBuy and RGS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MED: $14.90 vs. RGS: $20.32)
Brand notoriety: MED and RGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MED: 85% vs. RGS: 218%
Market capitalization -- MED: $417.52M vs. RGS: $17.1M
MED [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $417.52M. RGS’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $17.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $10.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the long-term than RGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MED’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MED’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the short-term than RGS.

Price Growth

MED (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +12.54% price change this week, while RGS (@Other Consumer Services) price change was -9.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +65.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

MED is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

RGS is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-0.13% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MED($418M) has a higher market cap than RGS($17.1M). RGS YTD gains are higher at: -14.334 vs. MED (-15.437). MED has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 140M vs. RGS (22.2M). MED has more cash in the bank: 150M vs. RGS (7.15M). MED has less debt than RGS: MED (22M) vs RGS (525M). MED has higher revenues than RGS: MED (1.07B) vs RGS (216M).
MEDRGSMED / RGS
Capitalization418M17.1M2,444%
EBITDA140M22.2M631%
Gain YTD-15.437-14.334108%
P/E Ratio4.12N/A-
Revenue1.07B216M496%
Total Cash150M7.15M2,097%
Total Debt22M525M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MED vs RGS: Fundamental Ratings
MED
RGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
908
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
270
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a23

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MED's Valuation (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGS (86) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

MED's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's SMR Rating (8) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MED (90) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew significantly faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RGS (63) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

MED's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGS (70) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEDRGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HELFY2.620.05
+2.14%
Hellofresh SE
PYYX5.250.01
+0.19%
Pyxus International, Inc.
ELVAF0.90N/A
N/A
Evolva Holding AG
IDCBY15.50-0.06
-0.39%
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
SRGHY14.70-0.60
-3.92%
Shoprite Holdings Ltd.

RGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and TRIP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and TRIP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGS
1D Price
Change %
RGS100%
-4.11%
TRIP - RGS
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
BKNG - RGS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
CSV - RGS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
RCL - RGS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
MED - RGS
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
More