MED
Price
$13.05
Change
-$0.61 (-4.47%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
417.52M
32 days until earnings call
RGS
Price
$18.00
Change
-$0.76 (-4.05%)
Updated
Apr 3, 03:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.1M
Ad is loading...

MED vs RGS

Header iconMED vs RGS Comparison
Open Charts MED vs RGSBanner chart's image
Medifast
Price$13.05
Change-$0.61 (-4.47%)
Volume$515
Capitalization417.52M
Regis
Price$18.00
Change-$0.76 (-4.05%)
Volume$100
Capitalization17.1M
MED vs RGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MED vs. RGS commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MED is a Hold and RGS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MED: $13.66 vs. RGS: $18.76)
Brand notoriety: MED and RGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MED: 88% vs. RGS: 42%
Market capitalization -- MED: $417.52M vs. RGS: $17.1M
MED [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $417.52M. RGS’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $17.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the long-term than RGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MED’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGS is a better buy in the short-term than MED.

Price Growth

MED (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -0.15% price change this week, while RGS (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +0.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

MED is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

RGS is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-3.34% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MED($418M) has a higher market cap than RGS($17.1M). RGS YTD gains are higher at: -20.911 vs. MED (-22.474). MED has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 140M vs. RGS (22.2M). MED has more cash in the bank: 150M vs. RGS (7.15M). MED has less debt than RGS: MED (22M) vs RGS (525M). MED has higher revenues than RGS: MED (1.07B) vs RGS (216M).
MEDRGSMED / RGS
Capitalization418M17.1M2,444%
EBITDA140M22.2M631%
Gain YTD-22.474-20.911107%
P/E Ratio4.12N/A-
Revenue1.07B216M496%
Total Cash150M7.15M2,097%
Total Debt22M525M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MED vs RGS: Fundamental Ratings
MED
RGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
553
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
167
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MED's Valuation (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGS (84) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

MED's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's SMR Rating (8) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MED (89) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew significantly faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MED (86) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGS (67) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEDRGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IESC179.6310.77
+6.38%
IES Holdings
NRXS2.150.04
+1.90%
Neuraxis
RYAAY43.000.33
+0.77%
Ryanair Holdings plc
EPM5.150.03
+0.59%
Evolution Petroleum Corp
GHLD14.49-0.86
-5.60%
Guild Holdings Company