Advertisement
MED vs RGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MED is a Hold and RGS is a Hold.
| MED | RGS | MED / RGS | |
| Capitalization | 132M | 66.8M | 198% |
| EBITDA | -5.66M | 30.7M | -18% |
| Gain YTD | 10.206 | -3.748 | -272% |
| P/E Ratio | 531.50 | 11.08 | 4,796% |
| Revenue | 317M | 224M | 142% |
| Total Cash | 170M | 26M | 654% |
| Total Debt | 27.6M | 301M | 9% |
MED | RGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MED's Valuation (64) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RGS (89) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.
MED's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.
RGS's SMR Rating (85) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MED (94) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.
MED's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RGS (52) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.
MED's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RGS (2) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.
| MED | RGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 61% | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MED’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MED (@Personnel Services) experienced а -2.24% price change this week, while RGS (@Personnel Services) price change was -4.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -2.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
MED is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
RGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Personnel Services (-2.83% weekly)Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SMPSX | 54.08 | 1.74 | +3.32% |
| ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Svc | |||
| AMIGX | 107.03 | 0.74 | +0.70% |
| Amana Growth Institutional | |||
| HHDVX | 38.21 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Hamlin High Dividend Equity Inv | |||
| RYMAX | 72.35 | -0.33 | -0.45% |
| Rydex Telecommunications H | |||
| DEQYX | 13.85 | -0.09 | -0.65% |
| BNY Mellon Global Equity Income - Y | |||
MED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MED has been loosely correlated with EXPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MED jumps, then EXPE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MED | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MED | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| EXPE - MED | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| TNL - MED | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SABR - MED | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.59% | ||
| NCLH - MED | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
| TRIP - MED | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||
RGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and TRIP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and TRIP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGS | 100% | -2.20% | ||
| TRIP - RGS | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| BKNG - RGS | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| RCL - RGS | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
| TNL - RGS | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
| CCL - RGS | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
More | ||||