MED
Price
$13.75
Change
-$0.02 (-0.15%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
417.52M
2 days until earnings call
WW
Price
$42.99
Change
+$0.68 (+1.61%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
146.53M
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MED vs WW

Header iconMED vs WW Comparison
Open Charts MED vs WWBanner chart's image
Medifast
Price$13.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
Volume$201.9K
Capitalization417.52M
WW International
Price$42.99
Change+$0.68 (+1.61%)
Volume$295.65K
Capitalization146.53M
MED vs WW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MED vs. WW commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MED is a StrongBuy and WW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (MED: $13.75 vs. WW: $42.99)
Brand notoriety: MED: Not notable vs. WW: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MED: 88% vs. WW: 93%
Market capitalization -- MED: $417.52M vs. WW: $146.53M
MED [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $417.52M. WW’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $146.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $10.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MED and WW are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MED (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -7.72% price change this week, while WW (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +4.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +69.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

MED is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

WW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-2.72% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MED($418M) has a higher market cap than WW($147M). WW has higher P/E ratio than MED: WW (4.87) vs MED (4.12). WW YTD gains are higher at: 3285.040 vs. MED (-21.964). MED has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 140M vs. WW (74.7M). MED has more cash in the bank: 150M vs. WW (109M). MED has less debt than WW: MED (22M) vs WW (1.49B). MED has higher revenues than WW: MED (1.07B) vs WW (890M).
MEDWWMED / WW
Capitalization418M147M284%
EBITDA140M74.7M187%
Gain YTD-21.9643285.040-1%
P/E Ratio4.124.8785%
Revenue1.07B890M120%
Total Cash150M109M138%
Total Debt22M1.49B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MED vs WW: Fundamental Ratings
MED
WW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
9011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MED's Valuation (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for WW (88) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than WW’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MED (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

WW's SMR Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MED (90) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WW’s stock grew significantly faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MED (63) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for WW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than WW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MED
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWP3.830.01
+0.26%
abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund
NWLG36.60N/A
N/A
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF
TLCI25.41N/A
N/A
Touchstone International Equity ETF
MARW32.70-0.17
-0.50%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Mar ETF
EQWL108.47-1.32
-1.20%
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF