MED
Price
$12.74
Change
+$0.20 (+1.59%)
Updated
Oct 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
137.83M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
WW
Price
$32.93
Change
+$0.24 (+0.73%)
Updated
Oct 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
326.47M
3 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MED vs WW

Header iconMED vs WW Comparison
Open Charts MED vs WWBanner chart's image
Medifast
Price$12.74
Change+$0.20 (+1.59%)
Volume$991
Capitalization137.83M
WW International
Price$32.93
Change+$0.24 (+0.73%)
Volume$1.27K
Capitalization326.47M
MED vs WW Comparison Chart in %
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MED vs. WW commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MED is a Hold and WW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MED: $12.54 vs. WW: $32.69)
Brand notoriety: MED: Not notable vs. WW: Notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MED: 123% vs. WW: 214%
Market capitalization -- MED: $137.83M vs. WW: $326.47M
MED [@Personnel Services] is valued at $137.83M. WW’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $326.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MED and WW are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

MED (@Personnel Services) experienced а -2.94% price change this week, while WW (@Personnel Services) price change was +21.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +184.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

MED is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

WW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (+2.94% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WW($326M) has a higher market cap than MED($138M). MED has higher P/E ratio than WW: MED (38.00) vs WW (2.41). WW YTD gains are higher at: 2474.016 vs. MED (-28.831). WW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. MED (14.2M). MED has more cash in the bank: 163M vs. WW (152M). MED has less debt than WW: MED (13.1M) vs WW (477M). WW has higher revenues than MED: WW (741M) vs MED (480M).
MEDWWMED / WW
Capitalization138M326M42%
EBITDA14.2M1.15B1%
Gain YTD-28.8312474.016-1%
P/E Ratio38.002.411,575%
Revenue480M741M65%
Total Cash163M152M107%
Total Debt13.1M477M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MED vs WW: Fundamental Ratings
MED
WW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5945
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
9111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6434
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
251
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8543

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MED's Valuation (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for WW (87) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than WW’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MED (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.

WW's SMR Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MED (91) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WW’s stock grew significantly faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MED (64) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WW (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew somewhat faster than WW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KAOOY8.420.01
+0.12%
Kao Corp.
ZIVO13.33N/A
N/A
Zivo Bioscience, Inc.
KBDCY15.05N/A
N/A
Kingboard Holdings Ltd.
AAYYY10.31N/A
N/A
Australian Agricultural Co Ltd.
SSUP0.08N/A
-2.96%
Superior Industries International, Inc.