Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDBX vs MEDFX
MEDBX vs MEDFX Comparison
Open Charts MEDBX vs MEDFX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$12.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.24B
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R3
Price$12.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.24B
MEDBX vs MEDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDBX vs. MEDFX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDBX is a Hold and MEDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX (7.24B) and MEDFX (7.24B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MEDFX pays higher dividends than MEDBX: MEDFX (6.44) vs MEDBX (5.69). MEDBX was incepted earlier than MEDFX: MEDBX (23 years) vs MEDFX (17 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than MEDFX (1.07). MEDBX (58.00) and MEDFX (58.00) have comparable annual turnover. MEDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MEDBX: MEDFX (0) vs MEDBX (1000). MEDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. MEDBX (8.18). MEDFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.32 vs. MEDBX (7.26).
| MEDBX | MEDFX | MEDBX / MEDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.06 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.07 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.981 | 4.315 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.24B | 7.24B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.69 | 6.44 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 9.01 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.19 | 28.08 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.26 | 11.32 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.22 | 37.10 | 73% |