Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDBX vs REBAX
MEDBX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDBX vs REBAX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$12.04
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.12B
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets280.77M
MEDBX vs REBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDBX vs. REBAX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDBX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.12B vs. REBAX (281M). MEDBX pays higher dividends than REBAX: MEDBX (5.69) vs REBAX (5.12). MEDBX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDBX (23 years) vs REBAX (19 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than REBAX (1.13). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). MEDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDBX (1000) vs REBAX (2000). REBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. MEDBX (6.32). REBAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.09 vs. MEDBX (6.21).
| MEDBX | REBAX | MEDBX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.13 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.13 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.535 | 3.257 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.12B | 281M | 2,533% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.69 | 5.12 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 7.24 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.52 | 17.94 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.21 | 9.09 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.85 | 32.78 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers