Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDBX vs REBAX
MEDBX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDBX vs REBAX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$12.53
Change+$0.05 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.93
Change+$0.05 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.37M
MEDBX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDBX vs. REBAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDBX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.4B vs. REBAX (335M). REBAX pays higher dividends than MEDBX: REBAX (5.00) vs MEDBX (4.69). MEDBX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDBX (23 years) vs REBAX (20 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than REBAX (1.13). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). MEDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDBX (1000) vs REBAX (2000). REBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.99 vs. MEDBX (6.80). REBAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.28 vs. MEDBX (5.50).
| MEDBX | REBAX | MEDBX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.13 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.13 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.353 | 8.570 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.4B | 335M | 2,210% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.69 | 5.00 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 7.99 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.33 | 29.74 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.50 | 8.28 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.57 | 43.76 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers