Ad is loading...
MEDBX vs REBAX
MEDBX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDBX vs REBAX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$11.84
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.89B
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.19M
MEDBX vs REBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDBX vs. REBAX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDBX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 6.89B vs. REBAX (274M). MEDBX pays higher dividends than REBAX: MEDBX (5.76) vs REBAX (5.13). MEDBX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDBX (23 years) vs REBAX (19 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than REBAX (1.13). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). MEDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDBX (1000) vs REBAX (2000). REBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. MEDBX (6.19). REBAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.07 vs. MEDBX (11.51).
| MEDBX | REBAX | MEDBX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.13 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.13 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.202 | 0.672 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.89B | 274M | 2,513% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.76 | 5.13 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.19 | 7.33 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.49 | 11.69 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.51 | 16.07 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.09 | 26.93 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers