Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDCX vs REBAX
MEDCX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDCX vs REBAX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt C
Price$12.68
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.63B
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$10.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.19M
MEDCX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDCX vs. REBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDCX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDCX has more cash in the bank: 7.63B vs. REBAX (347M). REBAX pays higher dividends than MEDCX: REBAX (4.77) vs MEDCX (4.38). MEDCX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDCX (23 years) vs REBAX (20 years). MEDCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than REBAX (1.13). MEDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDCX (1000) vs REBAX (2000). REBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.05 vs. MEDCX (9.69). REBAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.73 vs. MEDCX (6.31).
| MEDCX | REBAX | MEDCX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.13 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.13 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.642 | 11.258 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.63B | 347M | 2,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.38 | 4.77 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.69 | 11.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.55 | 33.81 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.31 | 8.73 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.07 | 43.85 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers