Ad is loading...
MEDCX vs VEGBX
MEDCX vs VEGBX Comparison
Open Charts MEDCX vs VEGBX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt C
Price$11.60
Change-$0.09 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.75B
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Admiral
Price$22.51
Change-$0.19 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.24B
MEDCX vs VEGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDCX vs. VEGBX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDCX is a Hold and VEGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDCX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. VEGBX (4.24B). VEGBX pays higher dividends than MEDCX: VEGBX (6.88) vs MEDCX (5.76). MEDCX was incepted earlier than VEGBX: MEDCX (23 years) vs VEGBX (7 years). MEDCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than VEGBX (0.35). VEGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. MEDCX (58.00). MEDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEGBX: MEDCX (1000) vs VEGBX (50000). VEGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. MEDCX (3.08). VEGBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.87 vs. MEDCX (10.91).
| MEDCX | VEGBX | MEDCX / VEGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.35 | 517% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.35 | 520% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.062 | -1.371 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.75B | 4.24B | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.76 | 6.88 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.08 | 4.45 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.02 | 17.09 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.91 | 25.87 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.50 | N/A | - |