Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDCX vs VEGBX
MEDCX vs VEGBX Comparison
Open Charts MEDCX vs VEGBX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt C
Price$12.08
Change-$0.04 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.15B
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Admiral
Price$23.56
Change-$0.10 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
MEDCX vs VEGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDCX vs. VEGBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDCX is a Hold and VEGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDCX has more cash in the bank: 7.15B vs. VEGBX (4.57B). VEGBX pays higher dividends than MEDCX: VEGBX (6.87) vs MEDCX (5.69). MEDCX was incepted earlier than VEGBX: MEDCX (23 years) vs VEGBX (8 years). MEDCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than VEGBX (0.35). VEGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. MEDCX (58.00). MEDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEGBX: MEDCX (1000) vs VEGBX (50000). VEGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. MEDCX (6.50). VEGBX return over 5 years is better than : 18.23 vs. MEDCX (6.83).
| MEDCX | VEGBX | MEDCX / VEGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.35 | 517% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.35 | 520% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.877 | 4.370 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.15B | 4.57B | 157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.69 | 6.87 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 8.24 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.08 | 33.81 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.83 | 18.23 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.75 | N/A | - |