Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDHX vs REBAX
MEDHX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDHX vs REBAX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R6
Price$12.63
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.63B
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$10.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.19M
MEDHX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDHX vs. REBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDHX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDHX has more cash in the bank: 7.63B vs. REBAX (347M). MEDHX pays higher dividends than REBAX: MEDHX (5.43) vs REBAX (4.77). MEDHX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDHX (20 years) vs REBAX (20 years). REBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than MEDHX (0.71). MEDHX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDHX (0) vs REBAX (2000). REBAX (11.05) and MEDHX (10.93) have marching annual gain over last year. MEDHX return over 5 years is better than : 12.45 vs. REBAX (8.73).
| MEDHX | REBAX | MEDHX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.13 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.13 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.678 | 11.258 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.63B | 347M | 2,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.43 | 4.77 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.93 | 11.05 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.06 | 33.81 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.45 | 8.73 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.06 | 43.85 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers