Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDHX vs REBAX
MEDHX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDHX vs REBAX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R6
Price$12.46
Change+$0.05 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.93
Change+$0.05 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.37M
MEDHX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDHX vs. REBAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDHX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDHX has more cash in the bank: 7.4B vs. REBAX (335M). MEDHX pays higher dividends than REBAX: MEDHX (5.77) vs REBAX (5.00). MEDHX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDHX (19 years) vs REBAX (20 years). REBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than MEDHX (0.71). MEDHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). MEDHX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDHX (0) vs REBAX (2000). REBAX (7.99) and MEDHX (7.91) have marching annual gain over last year. MEDHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.49 vs. REBAX (8.28).
| MEDHX | REBAX | MEDHX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.13 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.13 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.171 | 8.570 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.4B | 335M | 2,210% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.77 | 5.00 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.91 | 7.99 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.64 | 29.74 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.49 | 8.28 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.24 | 43.76 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers