Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDHX vs REBAX
MEDHX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDHX vs REBAX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R6
Price$12.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.55B
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.82M
MEDHX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDHX vs. REBAX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDHX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDHX has more cash in the bank: 7.55B vs. REBAX (342M). MEDHX pays higher dividends than REBAX: MEDHX (5.60) vs REBAX (4.91). MEDHX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDHX (19 years) vs REBAX (20 years). REBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than MEDHX (0.71). MEDHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). MEDHX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDHX (0) vs REBAX (2000). MEDHX (7.94) and REBAX (7.90) have marching annual gain over last year. MEDHX return over 5 years is better than : 14.38 vs. REBAX (11.08).
| MEDHX | REBAX | MEDHX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.13 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.13 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.292 | 9.571 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 342M | 2,208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.60 | 4.91 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 7.90 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.57 | 38.04 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.38 | 11.08 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.53 | 44.25 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers