Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MEDHX vs REBAX
MEDHX vs REBAX Comparison
Open Charts MEDHX vs REBAX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R6
Price$12.38
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.49B
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond A
Price$9.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.38M
MEDHX vs REBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MEDHX vs. REBAX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDHX is a Hold and REBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDHX has more cash in the bank: 7.49B vs. REBAX (331M). MEDHX pays higher dividends than REBAX: MEDHX (5.98) vs REBAX (5.03). MEDHX was incepted earlier than REBAX: MEDHX (19 years) vs REBAX (20 years). REBAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than MEDHX (0.71). MEDHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. REBAX (41.00). MEDHX has a lower initial minimum investment than REBAX: MEDHX (0) vs REBAX (2000). MEDHX (8.54) and REBAX (8.43) have marching annual gain over last year. MEDHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.16 vs. REBAX (7.96).
| MEDHX | REBAX | MEDHX / REBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.13 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.13 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.980 | 7.578 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.49B | 331M | 2,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.98 | 5.03 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | 8.43 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.39 | 23.38 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.16 | 7.96 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.63 | 41.08 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers