It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MEDIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLRY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MEDIF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLRY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
MEDIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +1.33% price change this week, while TLRY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.90%.
TLRY is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
MEDIF | TLRY | MEDIF / TLRY | |
Capitalization | 19.1M | 1.87B | 1% |
EBITDA | -41.42M | -1.23B | 3% |
Gain YTD | -6.173 | -46.087 | 13% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 8.52 | - |
Revenue | 22.2M | 700M | 3% |
Total Cash | 20.2M | 260M | 8% |
Total Debt | 218K | 529M | 0% |
MEDIF | TLRY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TLRY's Valuation (57) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEDIF (91) in the null industry. This means that TLRY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEDIF’s over the last 12 months.
TLRY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as MEDIF (100) in the null industry. This means that TLRY’s stock grew similarly to MEDIF’s over the last 12 months.
TLRY's SMR Rating (91) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as MEDIF (95) in the null industry. This means that TLRY’s stock grew similarly to MEDIF’s over the last 12 months.
MEDIF's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as TLRY (87) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that MEDIF’s stock grew similarly to TLRY’s over the last 12 months.
TLRY's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as MEDIF (100) in the null industry. This means that TLRY’s stock grew similarly to MEDIF’s over the last 12 months.
MEDIF | TLRY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago83% | 2 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 6 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEDIF has been loosely correlated with CGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEDIF jumps, then CGC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MEDIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MEDIF | 100% | +2.36% | ||
CGC - MEDIF | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
TLRY - MEDIF | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.33% | ||
ACB - MEDIF | 24% Poorly correlated | +4.20% | ||
AAWH - MEDIF | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.95% | ||
GLASF - MEDIF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.99% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLRY has been closely correlated with CGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TLRY jumps, then CGC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLRY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TLRY | 100% | +3.33% | ||
CGC - TLRY | 80% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
ACB - TLRY | 77% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
SNDL - TLRY | 76% Closely correlated | +4.17% | ||
CRON - TLRY | 73% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
OGI - TLRY | 60% Loosely correlated | +5.23% | ||
More |