MEDXF
Price
$1.99
Change
-$0.14 (-6.57%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
64.09M
38 days until earnings call
MKGAF
Price
$126.10
Change
+$1.59 (+1.28%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
54.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MEDXF vs MKGAF

Header iconMEDXF vs MKGAF Comparison
Open Charts MEDXF vs MKGAFBanner chart's image
Medexus Pharmaceuticals
Price$1.99
Change-$0.14 (-6.57%)
Volume$21.67K
Capitalization64.09M
Merck KGaA
Price$126.10
Change+$1.59 (+1.28%)
Volume$464
Capitalization54.05B
MEDXF vs MKGAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MEDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MEDXF vs. MKGAF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEDXF is a Hold and MKGAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MEDXF: $1.99 vs. MKGAF: $126.10)
Brand notoriety: MEDXF and MKGAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MEDXF: 147% vs. MKGAF: 92%
Market capitalization -- MEDXF: $64.09M vs. MKGAF: $54.05B
MEDXF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $64.09M. MKGAF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $54.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MEDXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMKGAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MEDXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MKGAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MEDXF is a better buy in the long-term than MKGAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MEDXF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKGAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MEDXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MKGAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MEDXF is a better buy in the short-term than MKGAF.

Price Growth

MEDXF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -9.75% price change this week, while MKGAF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +67.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MEDXF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.18% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKGAF($54B) has a higher market cap than MEDXF($64.1M). MEDXF has higher P/E ratio than MKGAF: MEDXF (99.50) vs MKGAF (16.29). MKGAF (-16.799) and MEDXF (-17.598) have similar YTD gains . MKGAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.87B vs. MEDXF (15.9M). MKGAF has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. MEDXF (9.33M). MEDXF has less debt than MKGAF: MEDXF (21.9M) vs MKGAF (9.4B). MKGAF has higher revenues than MEDXF: MKGAF (21.2B) vs MEDXF (106M).
MEDXFMKGAFMEDXF / MKGAF
Capitalization64.1M54B0%
EBITDA15.9M5.87B0%
Gain YTD-17.598-16.799105%
P/E Ratio99.5016.29611%
Revenue106M21.2B1%
Total Cash9.33M1.57B1%
Total Debt21.9M9.4B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEDXF vs MKGAF: Fundamental Ratings
MEDXF
MKGAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9070
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6277
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
988
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MKGAF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEDXF (81). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MEDXF’s over the last 12 months.

MKGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MEDXF (100). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to MEDXF’s over the last 12 months.

MKGAF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MEDXF (90). This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to MEDXF’s over the last 12 months.

MEDXF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as MKGAF (77). This means that MEDXF’s stock grew similarly to MKGAF’s over the last 12 months.

MEDXF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MKGAF (88). This means that MEDXF’s stock grew significantly faster than MKGAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEDXFMKGAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MEDXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBOOY49.021.76
+3.72%
Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. De C.V.
CMPD3.880.08
+2.11%
CompuMed, Inc.
ARGHF0.34N/A
+0.66%
ARGO CORPORATION
CHFLF0.52N/A
N/A
CHINA FEIHE LTD.
ABXXF22.66-0.09
-0.40%
ABAXX Technologies Inc.

MEDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEDXF and LBTSF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEDXF and LBTSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEDXF
1D Price
Change %
MEDXF100%
-6.57%
LBTSF - MEDXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRMD - MEDXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
MKGAF - MEDXF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
MCUJF - MEDXF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEDIF - MEDXF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
More

MKGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKGAF has been loosely correlated with MKKGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKGAF jumps, then MKKGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKGAF
1D Price
Change %
MKGAF100%
+1.28%
MKKGY - MKGAF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
AQST - MKGAF
19%
Poorly correlated
+13.88%
INDV - MKGAF
17%
Poorly correlated
+4.87%
EVO - MKGAF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
EBS - MKGAF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
More