MEG
Price
$12.02
Change
-$0.18 (-1.48%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.19B
39 days until earnings call
QRHC
Price
$2.38
Change
-$0.08 (-3.25%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
171.05M
45 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MEG vs QRHC

Header iconMEG vs QRHC Comparison
Open Charts MEG vs QRHCBanner chart's image
Montrose Environmental Group
Price$12.02
Change-$0.18 (-1.48%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization1.19B
Quest Resource Holding
Price$2.38
Change-$0.08 (-3.25%)
Volume$2.9K
Capitalization171.05M
MEG vs QRHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MEG vs. QRHC commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEG is a Buy and QRHC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MEG: $12.20 vs. QRHC: $2.46)
Brand notoriety: MEG and QRHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MEG: 96% vs. QRHC: 66%
Market capitalization -- MEG: $1.19B vs. QRHC: $171.05M
MEG [@Environmental Services] is valued at $1.19B. QRHC’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $171.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MEG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQRHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QRHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MEG and QRHC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MEG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QRHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MEG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QRHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QRHC is a better buy in the short-term than MEG.

Price Growth

MEG (@Environmental Services) experienced а -17.68% price change this week, while QRHC (@Environmental Services) price change was -11.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -4.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

MEG is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

QRHC is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-4.17% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEG($1.2B) has a higher market cap than QRHC($171M). MEG YTD gains are higher at: -34.232 vs. QRHC (-62.154). MEG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.9M vs. QRHC (12.8M). MEG has more cash in the bank: 23.2M vs. QRHC (324K). QRHC has less debt than MEG: QRHC (67.6M) vs MEG (210M). MEG has higher revenues than QRHC: MEG (624M) vs QRHC (288M).
MEGQRHCMEG / QRHC
Capitalization1.2B171M699%
EBITDA31.9M12.8M249%
Gain YTD-34.232-62.15455%
P/E RatioN/A62.50-
Revenue624M288M217%
Total Cash23.2M324K7,160%
Total Debt210M67.6M311%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEG vs QRHC: Fundamental Ratings
MEG
QRHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5057
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
9495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9397
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1007
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MEG's Valuation (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QRHC (93) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that MEG’s stock grew significantly faster than QRHC’s over the last 12 months.

QRHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as MEG (100) in the null industry. This means that QRHC’s stock grew similarly to MEG’s over the last 12 months.

MEG's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as QRHC (95) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that MEG’s stock grew similarly to QRHC’s over the last 12 months.

MEG's Price Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as QRHC (97) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that MEG’s stock grew similarly to QRHC’s over the last 12 months.

QRHC's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MEG (100) in the null industry. This means that QRHC’s stock grew significantly faster than MEG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEGQRHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRGSX104.69N/A
N/A
Franklin Growth C
CSRYX36.71N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst3
JWSOX24.79N/A
N/A
JHancock New Opportunities R6
MMVFX7.95N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Company Value R4
QRSAX38.71N/A
N/A
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Advisor

QRHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QRHC and CLH have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QRHC and CLH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QRHC
1D Price
Change %
QRHC100%
-7.17%
CLH - QRHC
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
LNZA - QRHC
26%
Poorly correlated
-18.15%
NVRI - QRHC
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.83%
PESI - QRHC
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.07%
CWST - QRHC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More