MEGL
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.05 (-3.03%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.84M
SWIN
Price
$3.22
Change
+$0.16 (+5.23%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
87.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MEGL vs SWIN

Header iconMEGL vs SWIN Comparison
Open Charts MEGL vs SWINBanner chart's image
Magic Empire Global
Price$1.60
Change-$0.05 (-3.03%)
Volume$300
Capitalization12.84M
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share
Price$3.22
Change+$0.16 (+5.23%)
Volume$375
Capitalization87.08M
MEGL vs SWIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MEGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MEGL vs. SWIN commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEGL is a Hold and SWIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MEGL: $1.65 vs. SWIN: $3.06)
Brand notoriety: MEGL and SWIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MEGL: 3% vs. SWIN: 123%
Market capitalization -- MEGL: $12.84M vs. SWIN: $87.08M
MEGL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $12.84M. SWIN’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $87.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MEGL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MEGL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MEGL and SWIN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MEGL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWIN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MEGL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWIN is a better buy in the short-term than MEGL.

Price Growth

MEGL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.62% price change this week, while SWIN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +50.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +99.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

MEGL is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.18% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWIN($87.1M) has a higher market cap than MEGL($12.8M). MEGL has higher P/E ratio than SWIN: MEGL (75.19) vs SWIN (67.46). SWIN YTD gains are higher at: 85.455 vs. MEGL (-23.597).
MEGLSWINMEGL / SWIN
Capitalization12.8M87.1M15%
EBITDA-7.03MN/A-
Gain YTD-23.59785.455-28%
P/E Ratio75.1967.46111%
Revenue9.43MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEGLSWIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MEGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIOX4.740.15
+3.27%
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp
CHWY43.430.80
+1.88%
Chewy
SEB2911.0945.41
+1.58%
Seaboard Corp
SAIH7.25N/A
N/A
SAIHEAT Limited
SCLX5.30-0.08
-1.49%
Scilex Holding Company

MEGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEGL has been loosely correlated with SIEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEGL jumps, then SIEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEGL
1D Price
Change %
MEGL100%
+0.61%
SIEB - MEGL
44%
Loosely correlated
+5.22%
TOP - MEGL
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
LGHL - MEGL
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
HKXCY - MEGL
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
GREE - MEGL
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
More

SWIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWIN and TOP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWIN and TOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWIN
1D Price
Change %
SWIN100%
+5.88%
TOP - SWIN
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
MAUSY - SWIN
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEGL - SWIN
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
HIVE - SWIN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
HUT - SWIN
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.05%
More