MEPDF
Price
$15.90
Change
-$0.35 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.69B
NSVGF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MEPDF vs NSVGF

Header iconMEPDF vs NSVGF Comparison
Open Charts MEPDF vs NSVGFBanner chart's image
Medipal Holdings
Price$15.90
Change-$0.35 (-2.15%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.69B
Nass Vy Gateway
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$34.5K
Capitalization4.72M
MEPDF vs NSVGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MEPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MEPDF vs. NSVGF commentary
Jul 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEPDF is a Hold and NSVGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 10, 2025
Stock price -- (MEPDF: $15.90 vs. NSVGF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: MEPDF and NSVGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MEPDF: 14% vs. NSVGF: 133%
Market capitalization -- MEPDF: $3.69B vs. NSVGF: $4.72M
MEPDF [@Medical Distributors] is valued at $3.69B. NSVGF’s [@Medical Distributors] market capitalization is $4.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Distributors] industry ranges from $70.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Distributors] industry is $10.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MEPDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNSVGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MEPDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NSVGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MEPDF is a better buy in the long-term than NSVGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MEPDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MEPDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MEPDF (@Medical Distributors) experienced а -2.15% price change this week, while NSVGF (@Medical Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Distributors (+1.57% weekly)

Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEPDF($3.69B) has a higher market cap than NSVGF($4.72M). MEPDF YTD gains are higher at: 20.091 vs. NSVGF (0.000). MEPDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74B vs. NSVGF (-1.57M). MEPDF has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. NSVGF (0). NSVGF has less debt than MEPDF: NSVGF (1.24M) vs MEPDF (30B). MEPDF has higher revenues than NSVGF: MEPDF (3.35T) vs NSVGF (29.5K).
MEPDFNSVGFMEPDF / NSVGF
Capitalization3.69B4.72M78,199%
EBITDA74B-1.57M-4,721,541%
Gain YTD20.0910.000-
P/E Ratio12.29N/A-
Revenue3.35T29.5K11,359,322,034%
Total Cash252B0-
Total Debt30B1.24M2,427,184%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEPDF: Fundamental Ratings
MEPDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
97
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEPDFNSVGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
17%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MEPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONMD0.56N/A
+0.84%
OneMedNet Corp
COLB25.140.05
+0.20%
Columbia Banking System
MSEX54.81-0.07
-0.13%
Middlesex Water Company
TRP47.21-0.19
-0.40%
TC Energy Corp
TLYS1.45-0.04
-2.68%
Tilly's

MEPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEPDF and PDRX have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEPDF and PDRX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEPDF
1D Price
Change %
MEPDF100%
N/A
PDRX - MEPDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARRJF - MEPDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAHLY - MEPDF
0%
Poorly correlated
-4.12%
NSVGF - MEPDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSM - MEPDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
More

NSVGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSVGF and SHPMY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSVGF and SHPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSVGF
1D Price
Change %
NSVGF100%
N/A
SHPMY - NSVGF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZYXI - NSVGF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
PDRX - NSVGF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHTDF - NSVGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
AMFPF - NSVGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More