MET
Price
$94.84
Change
+$2.30 (+2.49%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
59.54B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFC
Price
$43.66
Change
+$0.60 (+1.39%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
71.5B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MET vs MFC

MET vs MFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MET vs. MFC commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MET is a Hold and MFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (MET: $92.54 vs. MFC: $43.06)
Brand notoriety: MET: Notable vs. MFC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MET: 96% vs. MFC: 81%
Market capitalization -- MET: $59.54B vs. MFC: $71.5B
MET [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $59.54B. MFC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $71.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $19.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MET’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MET’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MET and MFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MET’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

MET (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -1.24% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

MET is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-2.46% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFC($71.5B) has a higher market cap than MET($59.5B). MET (17.90) and MFC (17.50) have similar P/E ratio . MET (18.972) and MFC (18.688) have similar YTD gains . MET has more cash in the bank: 121B vs. MFC (25B). MFC has less debt than MET: MFC (13.4B) vs MET (21.1B). MET has higher revenues than MFC: MET (76B) vs MFC (53.2B).
METMFCMET / MFC
Capitalization59.5B71.5B83%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.97218.688102%
P/E Ratio17.9017.50102%
Revenue76B53.2B143%
Total Cash121B25B484%
Total Debt21.1B13.4B157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MET vs MFC: Fundamental Ratings
MET
MFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3136
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
296
SMR RATING
1..100
9698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (36) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (45). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (29). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's SMR Rating (96) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (98). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (42). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MET's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (39). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
METMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSHD53.902.50
+4.86%
Goosehead Insurance
DUOL120.671.16
+0.97%
Duolingo
RVP0.68N/A
-0.01%
Retractable Technologies
DDOG244.39-1.38
-0.56%
Datadog
FOSL3.99-0.17
-4.09%
Fossil Group