MET
Price
$85.34
Change
+$1.32 (+1.57%)
Updated
Oct 11, 01:23 PM (EDT)
19 days until earnings call
MFC
Price
$30.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MET vs MFC

Header iconMET vs MFC Comparison
Open Charts MET vs MFCBanner chart's image
MetLife
Price$85.34
Change+$1.32 (+1.57%)
Volume$600
CapitalizationN/A
Manulife Financial
Price$30.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.48M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MET vs MFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
MET vs. MFC commentary
Oct 11, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MET is a Buy and MFC is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 11, 2024
Stock price -- (MET: $84.03 vs. MFC: $30.09)
Brand notoriety: MET: Notable vs. MFC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MET: 96% vs. MFC: 78%
Market capitalization -- MET: $53.28B vs. MFC: $44.61B
MET [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $53.28B. MFC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $44.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the long-term than MET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the short-term than MFC.

Price Growth

MET (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +3.41% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

MET is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+2.62% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than MFC($44.6B). MET has higher P/E ratio than MFC: MET (40.71) vs MFC (12.74). MFC YTD gains are higher at: 36.154 vs. MET (30.119). MET has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. MFC (20.3B). MFC has less debt than MET: MFC (12.7B) vs MET (18.8B). MET has higher revenues than MFC: MET (66.4B) vs MFC (42.3B).
METMFCMET / MFC
Capitalization53.3B44.6B120%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.11936.15483%
P/E Ratio40.7112.74320%
Revenue66.4B42.3B157%
Total Cash308B20.3B1,517%
Total Debt18.8B12.7B148%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MET vs MFC: Fundamental Ratings
MET
MFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8284
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1633
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7521

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFC's Valuation (30) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (38). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (33). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MET's SMR Rating (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (100). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (41). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for MET (100). This means that MFC’s stock grew significantly faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
METMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME20.910.41
+2.00%
GameStop Corp
SPY576.13-1.01
-0.18%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.04-0.50
-0.22%
Apple
BTC.X60274.500000-307.601560
-0.51%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA238.77-2.28
-0.95%
Tesla

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with AFL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then AFL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
-0.60%
AFL - MET
86%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
PRU - MET
86%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
LNC - MET
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
CNO - MET
71%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
BHF - MET
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
More