MET
Price
$81.32
Change
+$0.07 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 18, 10:34 AM (EDT)
42 days until earnings call
PRU
Price
$118.85
Change
-$0.04 (-0.03%)
Updated
Dec 18, 02:47 PM (EDT)
55 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MET vs PRU

Header iconMET vs PRU Comparison
Open Charts MET vs PRUBanner chart's image
MetLife
Price$81.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.09%)
Volume$1.21K
CapitalizationN/A
Prudential Financial
Price$118.85
Change-$0.04 (-0.03%)
Volume$110
CapitalizationN/A
MET vs PRU Comparison Chart
Loading...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MET vs. PRU commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MET is a Hold and PRU is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MET: $81.25 vs. PRU: $118.89)
Brand notoriety: MET and PRU are both notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MET: 89% vs. PRU: 91%
Market capitalization -- MET: $53.28B vs. PRU: $42.17B
MET [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $53.28B. PRU’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $42.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MET’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than PRU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MET’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRU is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

MET (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -0.60% price change this week, while PRU (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

MET is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

PRU is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-1.42% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than PRU($42.2B). MET has higher P/E ratio than PRU: MET (40.71) vs PRU (17.25). MET YTD gains are higher at: 26.693 vs. PRU (19.821). PRU has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. MET (308B). MET has less debt than PRU: MET (18.8B) vs PRU (20.9B). MET has higher revenues than PRU: MET (66.4B) vs PRU (54.3B).
METPRUMET / PRU
Capitalization53.3B42.2B126%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.69319.821135%
P/E Ratio40.7117.25236%
Revenue66.4B54.3B122%
Total Cash308B341B90%
Total Debt18.8B20.9B90%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MET vs PRU: Fundamental Ratings
MET
PRU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6371
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1932
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRU's Valuation (16) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MET (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (32) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

MET's SMR Rating (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (52) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

MET's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (98) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
METPRU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRL32.15-0.19
-0.59%
Hormel Foods Corp
WWW23.16-0.20
-0.86%
Wolverine World Wide
KFY69.34-0.86
-1.23%
Korn Ferry
FRSX0.63-0.01
-2.32%
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd
VERI2.37-0.09
-3.66%
Veritone

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with AFL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then AFL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
-1.80%
AFL - MET
86%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
PRU - MET
85%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
CNO - MET
71%
Closely correlated
-1.99%
LNC - MET
66%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
BHF - MET
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
More