MET
Price
$82.49
Change
+$1.33 (+1.64%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.28B
28 days until earnings call
PWCDF
Price
$36.14
Change
+$0.66 (+1.86%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
18.61B
Ad is loading...

MET vs PWCDF

Header iconMET vs PWCDF Comparison
Open Charts MET vs PWCDFBanner chart's image
MetLife
Price$82.49
Change+$1.33 (+1.64%)
Volume$17.26K
Capitalization53.28B
Power Corp. of Canada
Price$36.14
Change+$0.66 (+1.86%)
Volume$19.46K
Capitalization18.61B
MET vs PWCDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MET vs. PWCDF commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MET is a Hold and PWCDF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (MET: $81.16 vs. PWCDF: $36.14)
Brand notoriety: MET: Notable vs. PWCDF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MET: 90% vs. PWCDF: 44%
Market capitalization -- MET: $53.28B vs. PWCDF: $18.61B
MET [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $53.28B. PWCDF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $18.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MET’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWCDF is a better buy in the long-term than MET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MET’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWCDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MET’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PWCDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWCDF is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

MET (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -3.08% price change this week, while PWCDF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

MET is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.17% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than PWCDF($18.6B). MET has higher P/E ratio than PWCDF: MET (40.71) vs PWCDF (18.90). PWCDF YTD gains are higher at: 15.833 vs. MET (-0.243). MET has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. PWCDF (8.93B). PWCDF has less debt than MET: PWCDF (15.6B) vs MET (18.8B). MET (66.4B) and PWCDF (64.8B) have equivalent revenues.
METPWCDFMET / PWCDF
Capitalization53.3B18.6B287%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.24315.833-2%
P/E Ratio40.7118.90215%
Revenue66.4B64.8B102%
Total Cash308B8.93B3,450%
Total Debt18.8B15.6B121%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MET vs PWCDF: Fundamental Ratings
MET
PWCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6324
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1628
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9735
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PWCDF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as MET (43) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PWCDF’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PWCDF (28) in the null industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to PWCDF’s over the last 12 months.

MET's SMR Rating (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PWCDF (99) in the null industry. This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to PWCDF’s over the last 12 months.

PWCDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MET (56) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PWCDF’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

PWCDF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MET (97) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PWCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
METPWCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABVIX16.89N/A
N/A
AB Large Cap Value I
GSCOX23.89N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts C
FEYIX26.01N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% I
TCMSX38.00N/A
N/A
Voya Small Cap Growth I
SUGYX12.24N/A
N/A
Pioneer Global Sustainable Growth Y

PWCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWCDF has been loosely correlated with MFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PWCDF jumps, then MFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWCDF
1D Price
Change %
PWCDF100%
+1.86%
MFC - PWCDF
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
PRU - PWCDF
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
BHF - PWCDF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
LNC - PWCDF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
MET - PWCDF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
More