Ad is loading...
MFADX vs QLENX
MFADX vs QLENX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs QLENX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$21.55
Change-$0.90 (-4.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.17M
MFADX vs QLENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. QLENX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Hold and QLENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLENX has more cash in the bank: 3.52B vs. MFADX (86.2M). QLENX pays higher dividends than MFADX: QLENX (6.56) vs MFADX (0.96). MFADX was incepted earlier than QLENX: MFADX (13 years) vs QLENX (12 years). QLENX (5.19) is less costly to investors than MFADX (2.20). QLENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 362.00 vs. MFADX (30.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLENX: MFADX (2000) vs QLENX (2500). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. MFADX (-1.18). QLENX return over 5 years is better than : 168.30 vs. MFADX (70.34).
| MFADX | QLENX | MFADX / QLENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 5.18 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 5.19 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.576 | 9.622 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.2M | 3.52B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 6.56 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.18 | 22.95 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.22 | 85.89 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.34 | 168.30 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.98 | 139.85 | 31% |