Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs QLENX
MFADX vs QLENX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs QLENX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$24.34
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.44M
MFADX vs QLENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. QLENX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Buy and QLENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLENX has more cash in the bank: 5.17B vs. MFADX (88.4M). QLENX pays higher dividends than MFADX: QLENX (6.20) vs MFADX (0.92). MFADX was incepted earlier than QLENX: MFADX (13 years) vs QLENX (12 years). QLENX (5.59) is less costly to investors than MFADX (2.34). QLENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 362.00 vs. MFADX (108.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLENX: MFADX (2000) vs QLENX (2500). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.86 vs. MFADX (10.05). QLENX return over 5 years is better than : 186.35 vs. MFADX (51.54).
| MFADX | QLENX | MFADX / QLENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 5.58 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 5.59 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.396 | 17.511 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.4M | 5.17B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 6.20 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.05 | 26.86 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.24 | 93.08 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.54 | 186.35 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.24 | 151.72 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement