Ad is loading...
MFADX vs QLENX
MFADX vs QLENX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs QLENX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$21.85
Change+$0.37 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.79M
MFADX vs QLENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. QLENX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Buy and QLENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLENX has more cash in the bank: 3.74B vs. MFADX (81.8M). QLENX pays higher dividends than MFADX: QLENX (6.56) vs MFADX (0.96). MFADX was incepted earlier than QLENX: MFADX (13 years) vs QLENX (12 years). QLENX (5.19) is less costly to investors than MFADX (2.20). QLENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 362.00 vs. MFADX (30.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLENX: MFADX (2000) vs QLENX (2500). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.42 vs. MFADX (-3.34). QLENX return over 5 years is better than : 161.01 vs. MFADX (46.97).
| MFADX | QLENX | MFADX / QLENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 5.18 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 5.19 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.872 | 8.403 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.8M | 3.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 6.56 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.34 | 21.42 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.27 | 76.81 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.97 | 161.01 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.95 | 136.34 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers