Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs REMIX
MFADX vs REMIX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs REMIX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$24.34
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.44M
Standpoint Multi-Asset Investor
Price$13.05
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets798.19M
MFADX vs REMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. REMIX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Buy and REMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REMIX has more cash in the bank: 798M vs. MFADX (88.4M). REMIX pays higher dividends than MFADX: REMIX (5.96) vs MFADX (0.92). MFADX was incepted earlier than REMIX: MFADX (13 years) vs REMIX (6 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than REMIX (1.64). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than REMIX: MFADX (2000) vs REMIX (2500). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.05 vs. REMIX (-10.38). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 51.54 vs. REMIX (43.89).
| MFADX | REMIX | MFADX / REMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.51 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.64 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.396 | -8.836 | -84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.4M | 798M | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 5.96 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.05 | -10.38 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.24 | 1.25 | 1,861% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.54 | 43.89 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers