Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs REMIX
MFADX vs REMIX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs REMIX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$23.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.71M
Standpoint Multi-Asset Investor
Price$13.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets818.13M
MFADX vs REMIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. REMIX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Buy and REMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REMIX has more cash in the bank: 818M vs. MFADX (87.7M). REMIX pays higher dividends than MFADX: REMIX (5.96) vs MFADX (0.92). MFADX was incepted earlier than REMIX: MFADX (13 years) vs REMIX (5 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than REMIX (1.64). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than REMIX: MFADX (2000) vs REMIX (2500). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.63 vs. REMIX (-8.54). REMIX (45.66) and MFADX (44.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MFADX | REMIX | MFADX / REMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.51 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.64 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.384 | -7.083 | -62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.7M | 818M | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 5.96 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.63 | -8.54 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.28 | -1.35 | -687% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | 45.66 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers