Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs REMIX
MFADX vs REMIX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs REMIX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$25.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.31M
Standpoint Multi-Asset Investor
Price$13.70
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets727.24M
MFADX vs REMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. REMIX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Buy and REMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REMIX has more cash in the bank: 727M vs. MFADX (89.3M). REMIX pays higher dividends than MFADX: REMIX (6.02) vs MFADX (0.86). MFADX was incepted earlier than REMIX: MFADX (13 years) vs REMIX (6 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than REMIX (1.64). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than REMIX: MFADX (2000) vs REMIX (2500). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. REMIX (-6.58). REMIX (43.64) and MFADX (41.82) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MFADX | REMIX | MFADX / REMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.51 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.64 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.445 | -4.348 | -286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.3M | 727M | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 6.02 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.29 | -6.58 | -202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.50 | 5.92 | 431% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.82 | 43.64 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement