Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs REMIX
MFADX vs REMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. REMIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Hold and REMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REMIX has more cash in the bank: 710M vs. MFADX (89M). REMIX pays higher dividends than MFADX: REMIX (5.44) vs MFADX (0.81). MFADX was incepted earlier than REMIX: MFADX (13 years) vs REMIX (6 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than REMIX (1.64). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than REMIX: MFADX (2000) vs REMIX (2500). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. REMIX (-0.30). REMIX return over 5 years is better than : 45.28 vs. MFADX (40.41).
| MFADX | REMIX | MFADX / REMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.51 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.64 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.703 | -0.631 | -2,330% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89M | 710M | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 5.44 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.29 | -0.30 | -4,153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.28 | 10.93 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.41 | 45.28 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement