Ad is loading...
MFADX vs REMIX
MFADX vs REMIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. REMIX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Hold and REMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REMIX has more cash in the bank: 936M vs. MFADX (78.9M). REMIX pays higher dividends than MFADX: REMIX (5.79) vs MFADX (0.96). MFADX was incepted earlier than REMIX: MFADX (13 years) vs REMIX (5 years). MFADX (2.20) is less costly to investors than REMIX (1.64). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than REMIX: MFADX (2000) vs REMIX (2500). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.22 vs. REMIX (-11.83). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 56.07 vs. REMIX (49.61).
| MFADX | REMIX | MFADX / REMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.51 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.64 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.902 | -11.360 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.9M | 936M | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 5.79 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.22 | -11.83 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.48 | -3.39 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.07 | 49.61 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers