Ad is loading...
MFBBX vs PCNNX
MFBBX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts MFBBX vs PCNNX
MFS Corporate Bond B
Price$12.30
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.52B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$9.03
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.6B
MFBBX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBBX vs. PCNNX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBBX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. MFBBX (4.53B). PCNNX pays higher dividends than MFBBX: PCNNX (4.28) vs MFBBX (3.73). MFBBX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: MFBBX (32 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). MFBBX (1.53) is less costly to investors than PCNNX (1.29). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. MFBBX (59.00). MFBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: MFBBX (1000) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. MFBBX (6.32). PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : 2.52 vs. MFBBX (-5.80).
| MFBBX | PCNNX | MFBBX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.24 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.29 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 2.476 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 12.6B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 4.28 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 8.15 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.54 | 9.68 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.80 | 2.52 | -230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...