Ad is loading...
MFBBX vs PGCAX
MFBBX vs PGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MFBBX vs PGCAX
MFS Corporate Bond B
Price$12.16
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.5B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Adm
Price$8.92
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.25B
MFBBX vs PGCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBBX vs. PGCAX commentary
May 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBBX is a Hold and PGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGCAX has more cash in the bank: 12.2B vs. MFBBX (4.5B). PGCAX pays higher dividends than MFBBX: PGCAX (4.23) vs MFBBX (3.76). MFBBX was incepted earlier than PGCAX: MFBBX (32 years) vs PGCAX (23 years). MFBBX (1.53) is less costly to investors than PGCAX (1.34). PGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. MFBBX (59.00). MFBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGCAX: MFBBX (1000) vs PGCAX (1000000). PGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. MFBBX (4.58). PGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.16 vs. MFBBX (-5.31).
| MFBBX | PGCAX | MFBBX / PGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.34 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.34 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.110 | 1.929 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.5B | 12.2B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 4.23 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.58 | 6.12 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.45 | 10.47 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.31 | 2.16 | -245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.20 | 22.33 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...