Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFBHX vs PBDCX
MFBHX vs PBDCX Comparison
Open Charts MFBHX vs PBDCX
MFS Corporate Bond R3
Price$12.29
Change-$0.05 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.51B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond C
Price$8.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.15B
MFBHX vs PBDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBHX vs. PBDCX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBHX is a Hold and PBDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDCX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. MFBHX (4.51B). MFBHX pays higher dividends than PBDCX: MFBHX (4.54) vs PBDCX (3.40). MFBHX was incepted earlier than PBDCX: MFBHX (20 years) vs PBDCX (21 years). PBDCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than MFBHX (0.78). PBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. MFBHX (59.00). MFBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDCX: MFBHX (0) vs PBDCX (1000). MFBHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.26 vs. PBDCX (3.90). MFBHX return over 5 years is better than : -4.40 vs. PBDCX (-5.03).
| MFBHX | PBDCX | MFBHX / PBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.24 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 2.24 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.420 | 2.293 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.51B | 12.1B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.54 | 3.40 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.26 | 3.90 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.63 | 12.07 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.40 | -5.03 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.13 | 14.00 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers