Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFBHX vs PBDCX
MFBHX vs PBDCX Comparison
Open Charts MFBHX vs PBDCX
MFS Corporate Bond R3
Price$12.63
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.64B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond C
Price$9.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.45B
MFBHX vs PBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBHX vs. PBDCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBHX is a Hold and PBDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDCX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. MFBHX (4.64B). MFBHX pays higher dividends than PBDCX: MFBHX (4.51) vs PBDCX (3.47). MFBHX was incepted earlier than PBDCX: MFBHX (20 years) vs PBDCX (21 years). PBDCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MFBHX (0.78). PBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. MFBHX (38.00). MFBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDCX: MFBHX (0) vs PBDCX (1000). MFBHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. PBDCX (3.46). MFBHX return over 5 years is better than : -3.57 vs. PBDCX (-4.33).
| MFBHX | PBDCX | MFBHX / PBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.10 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 2.10 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.652 | 6.457 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.64B | 12.5B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.51 | 3.47 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 3.46 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.94 | 15.08 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.57 | -4.33 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.98 | 19.14 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement