Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFBHX vs PBDCX
MFBHX vs PBDCX Comparison
Open Charts MFBHX vs PBDCX
MFS Corporate Bond R3
Price$12.46
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond C
Price$9.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.4B
MFBHX vs PBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBHX vs. PBDCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBHX is a Hold and PBDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDCX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MFBHX (4.57B). MFBHX pays higher dividends than PBDCX: MFBHX (4.51) vs PBDCX (3.47). MFBHX was incepted earlier than PBDCX: MFBHX (20 years) vs PBDCX (21 years). PBDCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than MFBHX (0.78). PBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. MFBHX (38.00). MFBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDCX: MFBHX (0) vs PBDCX (1000). MFBHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.79 vs. PBDCX (3.43). MFBHX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. PBDCX (-5.57).
| MFBHX | PBDCX | MFBHX / PBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.24 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 2.24 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.647 | 4.521 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 12.4B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.51 | 3.47 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 3.43 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 9.29 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.30 | -5.57 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.02 | 16.35 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers