Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFBKX vs PBDAX
MFBKX vs PBDAX Comparison
Open Charts MFBKX vs PBDAX
MFS Corporate Bond R6
Price$12.60
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.64B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond A
Price$9.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.45B
MFBKX vs PBDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBKX vs. PBDAX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBKX is a Hold and PBDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDAX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. MFBKX (4.64B). MFBKX pays higher dividends than PBDAX: MFBKX (4.84) vs PBDAX (4.21). MFBKX was incepted earlier than PBDAX: MFBKX (13 years) vs PBDAX (21 years). PBDAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MFBKX (0.43). PBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 270.00 vs. MFBKX (38.00). MFBKX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBDAX: MFBKX (0) vs PBDAX (1000). MFBKX (4.27) and PBDAX (4.24) have marching annual gain over last year. PBDAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.66 vs. MFBKX (-1.90).
| MFBKX | PBDAX | MFBKX / PBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.35 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.35 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.904 | 6.990 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.64B | 12.5B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.84 | 4.21 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.27 | 4.24 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.19 | 17.71 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.90 | -0.66 | 286% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.46 | 28.44 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement