Ad is loading...
MFBKX vs PGCAX
MFBKX vs PGCAX Comparison
Open Charts MFBKX vs PGCAX
MFS Corporate Bond R6
Price$12.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.48B
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Adm
Price$8.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.25B
MFBKX vs PGCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFBKX vs. PGCAX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBKX is a Hold and PGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGCAX has more cash in the bank: 12.2B vs. MFBKX (4.48B). MFBKX pays higher dividends than PGCAX: MFBKX (4.86) vs PGCAX (4.23). MFBKX was incepted earlier than PGCAX: MFBKX (13 years) vs PGCAX (23 years). PGCAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than MFBKX (0.43). PGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. MFBKX (59.00). MFBKX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGCAX: MFBKX (0) vs PGCAX (1000000). PGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. MFBKX (5.21). PGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.74 vs. MFBKX (0.04).
| MFBKX | PGCAX | MFBKX / PGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.34 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.34 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.314 | 1.700 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.48B | 12.2B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.86 | 4.23 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.21 | 5.64 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.52 | 9.87 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.04 | 1.74 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.80 | 22.98 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...