MFC
Price
$31.30
Change
+$0.17 (+0.55%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
44.61B
12 days until earnings call
PUK
Price
$25.23
Change
+$0.07 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFC vs PUK

Header iconMFC vs PUK Comparison
Open Charts MFC vs PUKBanner chart's image
Manulife Financial
Price$31.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.55%)
Volume$9.71K
Capitalization44.61B
Prudential
Price$25.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
Volume$5.3K
Capitalization25.79B
MFC vs PUK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFC vs. PUK commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFC is a StrongBuy and PUK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (MFC: $31.14 vs. PUK: $25.16)
Brand notoriety: MFC and PUK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFC: 56% vs. PUK: 63%
Market capitalization -- MFC: $44.61B vs. PUK: $25.79B
MFC [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $44.61B. PUK’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $25.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePUK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PUK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the long-term than PUK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PUK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the short-term than PUK.

Price Growth

MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +0.74% price change this week, while PUK (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

PUK is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.71% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFC($44.6B) has a higher market cap than PUK($25.8B). PUK has higher P/E ratio than MFC: PUK (15.34) vs MFC (12.74). PUK YTD gains are higher at: 60.223 vs. MFC (1.400). PUK has less debt than MFC: PUK (4.87B) vs MFC (12.7B). MFC has higher revenues than PUK: MFC (42.3B) vs PUK (12B).
MFCPUKMFC / PUK
Capitalization44.6B25.8B173%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.40060.2232%
P/E Ratio12.7415.3483%
Revenue42.3B12B353%
Total Cash20.3BN/A-
Total Debt12.7B4.87B261%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFC vs PUK: Fundamental Ratings
MFC
PUK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5863
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4647
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFC's Valuation (35) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUK (81) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUK’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUK (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew significantly faster than PUK’s over the last 12 months.

PUK's SMR Rating (94) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PUK’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

PUK's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (54) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PUK’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PUK (47) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to PUK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFCPUK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCD15.220.10
+0.66%
LMP Capital and Income Fund
RNEM55.05N/A
N/A
First Trust Emerging Markets Eq Sel ETF
YLDE52.95-0.03
-0.05%
Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Inc ETF
KFEB25.45-0.13
-0.51%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Feb
PXF59.06-0.42
-0.70%
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-US ETF