MFC
Price
$30.61
Change
-$0.22 (-0.71%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
44.61B
32 days until earnings call
PWCDF
Price
$29.58
Change
-$0.37 (-1.24%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.61B
Ad is loading...

MFC vs PWCDF

Header iconMFC vs PWCDF Comparison
Open Charts MFC vs PWCDFBanner chart's image
Manulife Financial
Price$30.61
Change-$0.22 (-0.71%)
Volume$1.43M
Capitalization44.61B
Power Corp. of Canada
Price$29.58
Change-$0.37 (-1.24%)
Volume$18.09K
Capitalization18.61B
MFC vs PWCDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFC vs. PWCDF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFC is a Hold and PWCDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MFC: $30.61 vs. PWCDF: $29.58)
Brand notoriety: MFC and PWCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFC: 60% vs. PWCDF: 48%
Market capitalization -- MFC: $44.61B vs. PWCDF: $18.61B
MFC [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $44.61B. PWCDF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $18.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWCDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWCDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the long-term than PWCDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWCDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWCDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWCDF is a better buy in the short-term than MFC.

Price Growth

MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +2.75% price change this week, while PWCDF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +3.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFC is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+3.53% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFC($44.6B) has a higher market cap than PWCDF($18.6B). PWCDF has higher P/E ratio than MFC: PWCDF (18.90) vs MFC (12.74). MFC YTD gains are higher at: -0.326 vs. PWCDF (-5.197). MFC has more cash in the bank: 20.3B vs. PWCDF (8.93B). MFC has less debt than PWCDF: MFC (12.7B) vs PWCDF (15.6B). PWCDF has higher revenues than MFC: PWCDF (64.8B) vs MFC (42.3B).
MFCPWCDFMFC / PWCDF
Capitalization44.6B18.6B240%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.326-5.1976%
P/E Ratio12.7418.9067%
Revenue42.3B64.8B65%
Total Cash20.3B8.93B227%
Total Debt12.7B15.6B81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFC vs PWCDF: Fundamental Ratings
MFC
PWCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1957
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3666
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
442
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PWCDF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as MFC (35) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PWCDF’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PWCDF (66) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to PWCDF’s over the last 12 months.

PWCDF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as MFC (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PWCDF’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PWCDF (57) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to PWCDF’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWCDF (42) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWCDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFCPWCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCNNX28.550.29
+1.03%
Janus Henderson Contrarian N
HWNIX11.530.07
+0.61%
Hotchkis & Wiley International Value I
HIASX18.250.07
+0.39%
Hartford Small Company HLS IA
FDCGX83.020.28
+0.34%
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples C
HLFMX7.87N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inst

PWCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWCDF has been loosely correlated with MFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PWCDF jumps, then MFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWCDF
1D Price
Change %
PWCDF100%
-1.25%
MFC - PWCDF
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
PRU - PWCDF
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
BHF - PWCDF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
LNC - PWCDF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
MET - PWCDF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
More