MFC
Price
$30.63
Change
-$0.25 (-0.81%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
44.61B
48 days until earnings call
SLLDY
Price
$9.72
Change
-$0.09 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFC vs SLLDY

Header iconMFC vs SLLDY Comparison
Open Charts MFC vs SLLDYBanner chart's image
Manulife Financial
Price$30.63
Change-$0.25 (-0.81%)
Volume$2.28M
Capitalization44.61B
Sanlam
Price$9.72
Change-$0.09 (-0.92%)
Volume$12.74K
Capitalization7.6B
MFC vs SLLDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLLDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFC vs. SLLDY commentary
Jun 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFC is a Hold and SLLDY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MFC: $30.63 vs. SLLDY: $9.72)
Brand notoriety: MFC and SLLDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFC: 96% vs. SLLDY: 47%
Market capitalization -- MFC: $44.61B vs. SLLDY: $7.6B
MFC [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $44.61B. SLLDY’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $7.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLLDY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLLDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the long-term than SLLDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLLDY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLLDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MFC and SLLDY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -4.31% price change this week, while SLLDY (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -3.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

SLLDY is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.43% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFC($44.6B) has a higher market cap than SLLDY($7.6B). MFC (12.74) and SLLDY (12.29) have similar P/E ratio . SLLDY YTD gains are higher at: 13.071 vs. MFC (-0.261). SLLDY has higher revenues than MFC: SLLDY (112B) vs MFC (42.3B).
MFCSLLDYMFC / SLLDY
Capitalization44.6B7.6B587%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.26113.071-2%
P/E Ratio12.7412.29104%
Revenue42.3B112B38%
Total Cash20.3BN/A-
Total Debt12.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFC vs SLLDY: Fundamental Ratings
MFC
SLLDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5667
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
932
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4690
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFC's Valuation (33) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as SLLDY (33) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as SLLDY (32) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's SMR Rating (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as SLLDY (100) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

SLLDY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MFC (53) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that SLLDY’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLLDY (90) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFCSLLDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLLDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNEMX21.81N/A
N/A
JPMorgan International Equity R6
NELIX61.39N/A
N/A
Nuveen Equity Long/Short I
GLERX13.91N/A
N/A
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd R Shares
MGKAX13.70N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Global Permanence A
GAAHX18.12N/A
N/A
GMO Resources R6

MFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFC has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFC jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFC
1D Price
Change %
MFC100%
-0.81%
MET - MFC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
PRU - MFC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
LNC - MFC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
PRI - MFC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
BHF - MFC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More

SLLDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLLDY and MFC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLLDY and MFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLLDY
1D Price
Change %
SLLDY100%
-0.92%
MFC - SLLDY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
LNC - SLLDY
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
PUK - SLLDY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
AAGIY - SLLDY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
PNGAY - SLLDY
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
More