MFC
Price
$30.56
Change
-$0.11 (-0.36%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
19 days until earnings call
SLLDY
Price
$9.86
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

MFC vs SLLDY

Header iconMFC vs SLLDY Comparison
Open Charts MFC vs SLLDYBanner chart's image
Manulife Financial
Price$30.56
Change-$0.11 (-0.36%)
Volume$1.25M
CapitalizationN/A
Sanlam
Price$9.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.93K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MFC vs SLLDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLLDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
MFC vs. SLLDY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFC is a Sell and SLLDY is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (MFC: $30.56 vs. SLLDY: $10.17)
Brand notoriety: MFC and SLLDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFC: 55% vs. SLLDY: 48%
Market capitalization -- MFC: $44.61B vs. SLLDY: $7.6B
MFC [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $44.61B. SLLDY’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $7.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLLDY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLLDY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the long-term than SLLDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLLDY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLLDY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLLDY is a better buy in the short-term than MFC.

Price Growth

MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.56% price change this week, while SLLDY (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +3.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFC is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+2.62% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFC($44.6B) has a higher market cap than SLLDY($7.6B). MFC (12.74) and SLLDY (12.29) have similar P/E ratio . MFC (38.281) and SLLDY (36.552) have similar YTD gains . SLLDY has higher revenues than MFC: SLLDY (112B) vs MFC (42.3B).
MFCSLLDYMFC / SLLDY
Capitalization44.6B7.6B587%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.28136.552105%
P/E Ratio12.7412.29104%
Revenue42.3B112B38%
Total Cash20.3BN/A-
Total Debt12.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFC vs SLLDY: Fundamental Ratings
MFC
SLLDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8026
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3353
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFC's Valuation (30) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as SLLDY (35) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as SLLDY (53) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

SLLDY's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as MFC (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that SLLDY’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as SLLDY (41) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLLDY (83) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew significantly faster than SLLDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFCSLLDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLLDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

SLLDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLLDY and MFC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLLDY and MFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLLDY
1D Price
Change %
SLLDY100%
+1.40%
MFC - SLLDY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
LNC - SLLDY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUK - SLLDY
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
AAGIY - SLLDY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
PNGAY - SLLDY
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
More